Dynamic effects of childbirth on female employment
| Full sample | Excluding Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi | Ho Chi Minh City | Hanoi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |||||
| Overall effect | −0.0559*** | (0.0004) | −0.0523*** | (0.0004) | −0.1644*** | (0.0030) | −0.0501*** | (0.0030) |
| Year 0 | −0.1214*** | (0.0017) | −0.1141*** | (0.0018) | −0.2612*** | (0.0094) | −0.1179*** | (0.0074) |
| Year 1 | −0.0558*** | (0.0014) | −0.0501*** | (0.0014) | −0.1953*** | (0.0086) | −0.0413*** | (0.0059) |
| Year 2 | −0.0461*** | (0.0012) | −0.0416*** | (0.0013) | −0.1728*** | (0.0084) | −0.0328*** | (0.0054) |
| Year 3 | −0.0451*** | (0.0011) | −0.0414*** | (0.0012) | −0.1506*** | (0.0080) | −0.0356*** | (0.0048) |
| Year 4 | −0.0438*** | (0.0011) | −0.0406*** | (0.0011) | −0.1482*** | (0.0079) | −0.0375*** | (0.0046) |
| Year 5 | −0.0475*** | (0.0010) | −0.0453*** | (0.0011) | −0.1328*** | (0.0075) | −0.0362*** | (0.0044) |
| Year 6 | −0.0488*** | (0.0010) | −0.0460*** | (0.0010) | −0.1450*** | (0.0075) | −0.0481*** | (0.0043) |
| Year 7 | −0.0481*** | (0.0010) | −0.0463*** | (0.0010) | −0.1342*** | (0.0076) | −0.0449*** | (0.0042) |
| Year 8 | −0.0469*** | (0.0009) | −0.0450*** | (0.0010) | −0.1397*** | (0.0078) | −0.0563*** | (0.0042) |
| R-squared | 0.0755 | 0.0741 | 0.2121 | 0.0650 | ||||
| Full sample | Excluding Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi | Ho Chi Minh City | Hanoi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |||||
| Overall effect | −0.0559*** | (0.0004) | −0.0523*** | (0.0004) | −0.1644*** | (0.0030) | −0.0501*** | (0.0030) |
| Year 0 | −0.1214*** | (0.0017) | −0.1141*** | (0.0018) | −0.2612*** | (0.0094) | −0.1179*** | (0.0074) |
| Year 1 | −0.0558*** | (0.0014) | −0.0501*** | (0.0014) | −0.1953*** | (0.0086) | −0.0413*** | (0.0059) |
| Year 2 | −0.0461*** | (0.0012) | −0.0416*** | (0.0013) | −0.1728*** | (0.0084) | −0.0328*** | (0.0054) |
| Year 3 | −0.0451*** | (0.0011) | −0.0414*** | (0.0012) | −0.1506*** | (0.0080) | −0.0356*** | (0.0048) |
| Year 4 | −0.0438*** | (0.0011) | −0.0406*** | (0.0011) | −0.1482*** | (0.0079) | −0.0375*** | (0.0046) |
| Year 5 | −0.0475*** | (0.0010) | −0.0453*** | (0.0011) | −0.1328*** | (0.0075) | −0.0362*** | (0.0044) |
| Year 6 | −0.0488*** | (0.0010) | −0.0460*** | (0.0010) | −0.1450*** | (0.0075) | −0.0481*** | (0.0043) |
| Year 7 | −0.0481*** | (0.0010) | −0.0463*** | (0.0010) | −0.1342*** | (0.0076) | −0.0449*** | (0.0042) |
| Year 8 | −0.0469*** | (0.0009) | −0.0450*** | (0.0010) | −0.1397*** | (0.0078) | −0.0563*** | (0.0042) |
| 0.0755 | 0.0741 | 0.2121 | 0.0650 | |||||
Note(s): This table reports the dynamic effects of childbirth on female employment from year 0 to year 8 using a pseudo-event study design based on Equation (1). Each coefficient represents the change in employment probability relative to the year before childbirth (event year ). The overall effect is the average employment penalty across event years 0–8. Robust standard errors clustered at the age-by-gender level are in parentheses. *, ** and *** are statistical significance levels at 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.