Comparison of FoMO, smartphone addiction and cyberloafing by residential status
| Variable | Living at home mean (SD) | Living away from home mean (SD) | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FoMO | 20.99 (6.20) | 21.64 (5.56) | −0.905 | 0.366 |
| Smartphone addiction | 21.23 (7.69) | 21.26 (6.19) | −0.035 | 0.972 |
| Cyberloafing | 40.34 (9.10) | 40.81 (8.87) | −0.427 | 0.670 |
| Variable | Living at home mean (SD) | Living away from home mean (SD) | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FoMO | 20.99 (6.20) | 21.64 (5.56) | −0.905 | 0.366 |
| Smartphone addiction | 21.23 (7.69) | 21.26 (6.19) | −0.035 | 0.972 |
| Cyberloafing | 40.34 (9.10) | 40.81 (8.87) | −0.427 | 0.670 |
Note(s): p > 0.05
Table 7 indicates that no statistically significant differences were found between students living at home and those living away from home in terms of FoMO (p = 0.366), smartphone addiction (p = 0.972) and cyberloafing (p = 0.670). These results indicate that residential status does not appear to substantially influence the levels of the three study variables in the present sample
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.