Literature audit linking prior evidence to the objective and to domain and item decisions
| Motivational domain | Conceptual definition in local smallholder food context | Theory-facing rationale | Illustrative support from literature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality and taste | Preference based on expected freshness and superior sensory experience of local smallholder foods | Superior intrinsic attributes increase expected utility and reduce perceived product risk | Feldmann and Hamm (2015), Memery et al. (2015), Kovács et al. (2022), Benedek and Fertő (2024) |
| Local patriotism | Buying local smallholder foods to support local producers and community and to express place attachment | Place attachment and identity related helping behaviour guide pro local choices | Skallerud and Wien (2019), Granzin and Olsen (1998), Memery et al. (2015), Kovács et al. (2022) |
| Provenance | Motivation rooted in origin cues, heritage, and authenticity, including the product's story of place that adds value beyond distance | Origin cues shape perceived value and trust; provenance acts as a meaning and quality signal | Thøgersen (2023), D'Amico (2004), Berg and Sevón (2014), Figueiredo et al. (2022), László and Wahlen (2024) |
| Fashion | Choosing local smallholder foods because it feels trendy, socially valued, or novel, and can be experienced as shareable | Social influence and signalling increase adoption; digitally mediated contexts can amplify symbolic meanings | Özkan Önem et al. (2025), Leong et al. (2021), Nyagadza et al. (2023), Anwar et al. (2025), Bukhari et al. (2020, 2023) |
| Personal contact with the producer | Preference based on direct interaction with producers, trust building, and access to credible first-hand information | Relational proximity and trust reduce uncertainty and strengthen loyalty intentions | Forney and Häberli (2016), Jia et al. (2024), László and Wahlen (2024) |
| Environmental protection and sustainability | Motivation grounded in perceived environmental benefits, such as lower transport burden, less waste, or responsible production meanings | Moral and normative beliefs and perceived impact translate into more sustainable choices | Enthoven and Van den Broeck (2021), Jia et al. (2024), Benedek and Fertő (2024) |
| Health consciousness | Preference driven by perceived naturalness, lower processing, and alignment with personal health goals | Health goals and perceived naturalness guide food choice and justify higher effort or price | Memery et al. (2015), Moser et al. (2011), Kovács et al. (2022) |
| Motivational domain | Conceptual definition in local smallholder food context | Theory-facing rationale | Illustrative support from literature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality and taste | Preference based on expected freshness and superior sensory experience of local smallholder foods | Superior intrinsic attributes increase expected utility and reduce perceived product risk | |
| Local patriotism | Buying local smallholder foods to support local producers and community and to express place attachment | Place attachment and identity related helping behaviour guide pro local choices | |
| Provenance | Motivation rooted in origin cues, heritage, and authenticity, including the product's story of place that adds value beyond distance | Origin cues shape perceived value and trust; provenance acts as a meaning and quality signal | |
| Fashion | Choosing local smallholder foods because it feels trendy, socially valued, or novel, and can be experienced as shareable | Social influence and signalling increase adoption; digitally mediated contexts can amplify symbolic meanings | |
| Personal contact with the producer | Preference based on direct interaction with producers, trust building, and access to credible first-hand information | Relational proximity and trust reduce uncertainty and strengthen loyalty intentions | |
| Environmental protection and sustainability | Motivation grounded in perceived environmental benefits, such as lower transport burden, less waste, or responsible production meanings | Moral and normative beliefs and perceived impact translate into more sustainable choices | |
| Health consciousness | Preference driven by perceived naturalness, lower processing, and alignment with personal health goals | Health goals and perceived naturalness guide food choice and justify higher effort or price |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.