Table 3.

Regression analysis of consumer cup return rate: comparison of model specifications

Returnln(Return)
OLSPanel linearOLS
Dependent variableM1M2M3 (Final)M4
Out0.04 (−0.022)0.028 (−0.025)−0.002 (−0.006)−0.001 (−0.006)
Instore−0.15*** (−0.047)−0.104 ** (−0.053)−0.073 *** (−0.014)−0.072*** (−0.015)
StoreHr0.435*** (−0.094)0.42 *** (−0.096)−0.026 (−0.026)−0.024 (−0.026)
OutHr0.002 (−0.03)0.019 (−0.031)−0.001 (−0.008)−0.001 (−0.008)
CollFq0.002 (−0.005)−0.003 (−0.006)−0.003 (−0.002)−0.003 (−0.002)
Xrate7.124*** (−0.487)7.524*** (−0.521)2.783*** (−0.143)2.773*** (−0.147)
Vol0.385**(−0.153)0.356** (−0.153)0.201*** (−0.038)0.204*** (−0.04)
Cupst0.015 (−0.049)−0.025 (−0.053)0.036*** (−0.014)0.036** (−0.015)
TourExp0 (0)0 (0)
VstLoc0 (0)0 (0)
VstFor0 (0)0 (0)
ln_TourExp−0.061 (−0.036)−0.057 (−0.036)
ln_VstLoc0.271*** (−0.055)0.262*** (−0.056)
ln_VstFor0.03 (−0.041)0.01 (−0.043)
RegionSejong0.803** (−0.37)0.367 ** (−0.168)0.291 (−0.177)
RegionSeogwipo0.199 (−0.283)0.288 *** (−0.073)0.281 *** (−0.074)
Region includedNoYesYesYes
Reference regionJeju
Observations960960960960
Time effectsNoNoRandomFixed
Hausman test Chi-square statistic = 3.1494, p = 0.9973. Random-effect model is preferred.
R20.260.2640.4660.472
Adjusted R20.2520.2540.4590.454
Residual std. error2.721 (df = 948)2.716 (df = 946)0.722 (df = 927)
F-statistic30.319***26.106***825.685***25.899***
Note(s):

Significant at p < 0.05 (**), p < 0.01 (***). For the random effects model (M3), the Wald chi-square statistic is reported in the F-statistic row

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal