Future research directions, associated challenges and suggested research questions
| Future research direction | Associated challenge | Suggested research question |
|---|---|---|
| Understanding how tacit knowledge can be elicited and formalized for reuse assessment | Reuse assessments remain highly dependent on tacit, experience-based knowledge that is difficult to capture, structure and integrate into digital systems | How can organizations systematically elicit, formalize, and sustain tacit expert knowledge to support reliable and scalable reuse assessments in circular product systems? |
| Assessing the role of KM maturity in enabling scalable reuse logic | The effectiveness of reuse artefacts depends on organizational routines for knowledge acquisition, validation and maintenance, which vary across firms | How does variation in KM maturity influence the scalability, reliability and long-term maintainability of reuse logic in configuration and PLM systems? |
| Integrating tacit knowledge into DPPs to support decision-making | DPPs facilitate lifecycle data but do not inherently capture tacit expert reasoning, limiting their ability to support complex reuse decisions | How can DPPs be designed or extended to incorporate, interface with or augment tacit expert knowledge in ways that support, knowledge-intensive reuse assessments? |
| Coordinating KM and DPP infrastructures across organizational actors | Circular value networks involve multiple stakeholders with fragmented knowledge flows, inconsistent semantics and limited mechanisms for shared governance | What governance structures and information-sharing arrangements enable KM and DPP infrastructures to support consistent, cross-actor reuse assessments at scale? |
| Future research direction | Associated challenge | Suggested research question |
|---|---|---|
| Reuse assessments remain highly dependent on tacit, experience-based knowledge that is difficult to capture, structure and integrate into digital systems | How can organizations systematically elicit, formalize, and sustain tacit expert knowledge to support reliable and scalable reuse assessments in circular product systems? | |
| The effectiveness of reuse artefacts depends on organizational routines for knowledge acquisition, validation and maintenance, which vary across firms | How does variation in KM maturity influence the scalability, reliability and long-term maintainability of reuse logic in configuration and PLM systems? | |
| DPPs facilitate lifecycle data but do not inherently capture tacit expert reasoning, limiting their ability to support complex reuse decisions | How can DPPs be designed or extended to incorporate, interface with or augment tacit expert knowledge in ways that support, knowledge-intensive reuse assessments? | |
| Circular value networks involve multiple stakeholders with fragmented knowledge flows, inconsistent semantics and limited mechanisms for shared governance | What governance structures and information-sharing arrangements enable KM and DPP infrastructures to support consistent, cross-actor reuse assessments at scale? |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.