Alignment of FBC initiatives with the “three Es”
| FBC initiative | Focus of PA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Economy – ensuring resources are acquired at the lowest possible cost without compromising quality | Efficiency – evaluating how well resources are used to maximise output | Effectiveness – measuring the extent to which objectives and intended outcomes are achieved | |
| Smaller, Low-Cost Missions | NASA shifted towards smaller, cheaper spacecraft that could be built faster; for instance, the Mars Pathfinder mission used a much smaller team than earlier efforts but still successfully landed the Sojourner rover on Mars in 1997 (McCurdy, 2001) | Compared to the flagship Cassini spacecraft, the 1996 Mars Global Surveyor embodied the FBC approach – built in under three years, at just 20% of Cassini's mass, and costing $220M versus $2B (Squibb et al., 2000) | |
| Simplified Mission Designs | FBC missions streamlined design to cut cost and complexity; for example, the NEAR mission was built in 27 months for $122M (down from $200M) and still successfully orbited and landed on asteroid Eros (Ward, 2012) | Hubble servicing missions in the 1990s highlighted lessons for future efforts, including the need for simple tool designs to improve extravehicular mission success (Werneth, 2001) | |
| Use of Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Technology | NASA used commercial off-the-shelf technology to reduce costs; for example, the 1998 Deep Space 1 mission employed COTS components, including a cost-effective ion propulsion system (Ward, 2012) | NASA standardised requirements for COTS hardware so sensors and modems could be reused across Mars missions, improving development efficiency (Delaney, 1997) | |
| Rapid Development Cycles | NASA Procedures and Guidelines (NPG) 7120.5. A recognised FBC's shift to shorter development cycles and expansion into tech programs, but an OIG audit found clearer implementation guidance was needed; notably, 16 FBC missions were completed in seven years versus 15 years for Cassini (NASA OIG, 2001; Frank, 2019) | Shorter timelines reduced delays and costs; missions like Stardust (1999) met tight deadlines while achieving their scientific goals (Frank, 2019) | |
| Risk-Tolerant Approach | The Deep Space 1 team faced the challenge of developing and operating high-risk technologies on a tight schedule and low budget while balancing a “take risks but don't fail” philosophy (Lehman et al., 2000) | NASA accepted higher risk levels, treating failures as learning opportunities; losses like MCO and MPL in 1999 informed improved mission designs (Ward, 2012) | |
| Multiple Missions Instead of One | The Discovery program reduced bureaucracy by having Congress approve overall selection rules, enabling NASA to initiate missions without repeated approval; four missions launched between February 1996 and February 1999 (Callahan, 2014; Frank, 2019) | Rather than relying on a single high-stakes mission, NASA launched multiple smaller missions to boost overall success and pursue diverse goals; for instance, Deep Space 1 (1998) tested propulsion technology, while Stardust (1999) collected comet samples, contributing to four successful Discovery missions in the late 1990s (McCurdy, 2001; Frank, 2019) | |
| Decentralised Decision-Making | NASA empowered small teams and project managers to make rapid decisions with minimal bureaucracy; for example, JPL's autonomy on Mars Pathfinder (1997) enabled quick problem-solving, contrasting with NASA's earlier centralised, military-style approach (Hamaker, 1999) | In a 2000 Senate hearing, NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin cautioned against rigid, one-size-fits-all approaches that stifle ingenuity, while the Discovery program's success was partly attributed to decentralised PI-led management giving investigators full mission control (U.S. Senate, 2000; Issac, 1997) | |
| Lean Management Practices | Advances in microtechnology reduced spacecraft mass, enabling smaller, cheaper launches and cutting costs given launch prices of $10,000–$32,000 per kg (McCurdy, 2001; Jones, 2015) | NASA streamlined workflows to boost efficiency; Mars Pathfinder (1997) was built in three years using parallel development and lean management, enabling rapid decisions with a small team, and required far less documentation than Cassini (3 vs 36 cm) (Frank, 2019; Taylor, 2007) | |
| Flexible Contracting | NASA partnered with industry and academia to tap external expertise and cut costs, using flexible procurement and off-the-shelf technology to speed development (Dumas and Walton, 2000) | ||
| Failure-Tolerant Culture | NASA defended its FY2002 plan against GAO criticism by citing NPG 7120.5's FBC approach, emphasising mission success through prudent risk acceptance; despite 1999 failures, FBC missions achieved higher scientific output per dollar than many past programs (GAO, 2001; Dillon and Madsen, 2001) | ||
| Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration | Cross-functional collaboration among engineers, scientists and planners optimised designs and reduced redundancy; FBC's use of small, modular satellites lowered costs, sped development and increased mission frequency (Casler, 2014) | ||
| FBC initiative | Focus of PA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Economy – ensuring resources are acquired at the lowest possible cost without compromising quality | Efficiency – evaluating how well resources are used to maximise output | Effectiveness – measuring the extent to which objectives and intended outcomes are achieved | |
| Smaller, Low-Cost Missions | NASA shifted towards smaller, cheaper spacecraft that could be built faster; for instance, the Mars Pathfinder mission used a much smaller team than earlier efforts but still successfully landed the Sojourner rover on Mars in 1997 ( | Compared to the flagship Cassini spacecraft, the 1996 Mars Global Surveyor embodied the FBC approach – built in under three years, at just 20% of Cassini's mass, and costing $220M versus $2B ( | |
| Simplified Mission Designs | FBC missions streamlined design to cut cost and complexity; for example, the NEAR mission was built in 27 months for $122M (down from $200M) and still successfully orbited and landed on asteroid Eros ( | Hubble servicing missions in the 1990s highlighted lessons for future efforts, including the need for simple tool designs to improve extravehicular mission success ( | |
| Use of Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Technology | NASA used commercial off-the-shelf technology to reduce costs; for example, the 1998 Deep Space 1 mission employed COTS components, including a cost-effective ion propulsion system ( | NASA standardised requirements for COTS hardware so sensors and modems could be reused across Mars missions, improving development efficiency ( | |
| Rapid Development Cycles | NASA Procedures and Guidelines (NPG) 7120.5. A recognised FBC's shift to shorter development cycles and expansion into tech programs, but an OIG audit found clearer implementation guidance was needed; notably, 16 FBC missions were completed in seven years versus 15 years for Cassini ( | Shorter timelines reduced delays and costs; missions like Stardust (1999) met tight deadlines while achieving their scientific goals ( | |
| Risk-Tolerant Approach | The Deep Space 1 team faced the challenge of developing and operating high-risk technologies on a tight schedule and low budget while balancing a “take risks but don't fail” philosophy ( | NASA accepted higher risk levels, treating failures as learning opportunities; losses like MCO and MPL in 1999 informed improved mission designs ( | |
| Multiple Missions Instead of One | The Discovery program reduced bureaucracy by having Congress approve overall selection rules, enabling NASA to initiate missions without repeated approval; four missions launched between February 1996 and February 1999 ( | Rather than relying on a single high-stakes mission, NASA launched multiple smaller missions to boost overall success and pursue diverse goals; for instance, Deep Space 1 (1998) tested propulsion technology, while Stardust (1999) collected comet samples, contributing to four successful Discovery missions in the late 1990s ( | |
| Decentralised Decision-Making | NASA empowered small teams and project managers to make rapid decisions with minimal bureaucracy; for example, JPL's autonomy on Mars Pathfinder (1997) enabled quick problem-solving, contrasting with NASA's earlier centralised, military-style approach ( | In a 2000 Senate hearing, NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin cautioned against rigid, one-size-fits-all approaches that stifle ingenuity, while the Discovery program's success was partly attributed to decentralised PI-led management giving investigators full mission control ( | |
| Lean Management Practices | Advances in microtechnology reduced spacecraft mass, enabling smaller, cheaper launches and cutting costs given launch prices of $10,000–$32,000 per kg ( | NASA streamlined workflows to boost efficiency; Mars Pathfinder (1997) was built in three years using parallel development and lean management, enabling rapid decisions with a small team, and required far less documentation than Cassini (3 vs 36 cm) ( | |
| Flexible Contracting | NASA partnered with industry and academia to tap external expertise and cut costs, using flexible procurement and off-the-shelf technology to speed development ( | ||
| Failure-Tolerant Culture | NASA defended its FY2002 plan against GAO criticism by citing NPG 7120.5's FBC approach, emphasising mission success through prudent risk acceptance; despite 1999 failures, FBC missions achieved higher scientific output per dollar than many past programs ( | ||
| Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration | Cross-functional collaboration among engineers, scientists and planners optimised designs and reduced redundancy; FBC's use of small, modular satellites lowered costs, sped development and increased mission frequency ( | ||
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.