Summary of the CSI-CCI dual-process framework
| Core insight | Description | Empirical evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Effect size ≠ mechanism | While statistically indistinguishable, Pe's direct effect dissipates upon controlling for PS, whereas the other dimensions remain robust | Pe → PI: 0.111* → 0.060 (n.s.) Ex → PI: 0.246*** → 0.170** R → PI: 0.162** → 0.114* En → PI: 0.252*** → 0.222*** |
| Same trust, different routes | CSI builds trust via the central route, while CCI builds trust via the peripheral route | CSI→PT: 0.158** / 0.208*** CCI→ PT: 0.247*** / 0.128* |
| PS as a boundary condition | PS negatively moderates the PT–PI relationship. High PS triggers systematic processing, thereby reducing reliance on PT as a peripheral heuristic | PT× PS → PI: β = −0.088* Pe indirect effect: 0.050* [0.010, 0.093] (low PS), n.s. (high PS) |
| Core insight | Description | Empirical evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Effect size ≠ mechanism | While statistically indistinguishable, Pe's direct effect dissipates upon controlling for PS, whereas the other dimensions remain robust | Pe → PI: 0.111* → 0.060 (n.s.) |
| Same trust, different routes | CSI builds trust via the central route, while CCI builds trust via the peripheral route | CSI→PT: 0.158** / 0.208*** |
| PS as a boundary condition | PS negatively moderates the PT–PI relationship. High PS triggers systematic processing, thereby reducing reliance on PT as a peripheral heuristic | PT× PS → PI: β = −0.088* |
Note(s): ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.