Hierarchical linear model (HLM) for exports per income classification
| Year | Model | R2 | F(df) | P | R2 change | F(df) change | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-income LAC | 1 | 0.917 | 55.030(4,20) | 0.000 | |||
| 2 | 0.928 | 49.199(5,19) | 0.000 | 0.012 | 3.072(1,19) | 0.095* | |
| 3 | 0.932 | 40.939(6,18) | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.902(1,18) | 0.354 | |
| 4 | 0.933 | 33.948(7,17) | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.386(1,17) | 0.542 | |
| 5 | 0.938 | 30.169(8,16) | 0.000 | 0.005 | 1.181(1,16) | 0.292 | |
| 6 | 0.942 | 27.137(9,15) | 0.000 | 0.004 | 1.117(1,15) | 0.306 | |
| TRFR (25.07)***, FDI (2.811)**, IND (11.982)**, LPCUST (−2.074)*, N = 25 | |||||||
| Upper-middle-income LAC | 1 | 0.967 | 351.577(4,45) | 0.000 | |||
| 2 | 0.969 | 272.099(5,44) | 0.000 | 0.001 | 2.089(1,44) | 0.155 | |
| 3 | 0.970 | 232.702(6,43) | 0.000 | 0.001 | 2.088(1,43) | 0.156 | |
| 4 | 0.970 | 194.904(7,42) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.018(1,42) | 0.895 | |
| 5 | 0.970 | 166.568(8,41) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.021(1,41) | 0.886 | |
| 6 | 0.972 | 153.486(9,40) | 0.000 | 0.002 | 2.428(1,40) | 0.127 | |
| GDP (0.8732)***, IND (0.482)**, N = 50 | |||||||
| Lower-middle-income LAC | 1 | 0.928 | 64,064(4,20) | 0.000 | |||
| 2 | 0.931 | 50.918(5,19) | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.807(1,19) | 0.380 | |
| 3 | 0.931 | 40.672(6,18) | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.197(1,18) | 0.662 | |
| 4 | 0.939 | 37.226(7,17) | 0.000 | 0.007 | 2.068(1,17) | 0.168 | |
| 5 | 0.939 | 30.720(8,16) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 5.409(1,16) | 0.862 | |
| 6 | 0.939 | 25.601(9,15) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 5.672(1,15) | 0.989 | |
| Year | Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-income LAC | |||||||
| TRFR (25.07)***, FDI (2.811)**, IND (11.982)**, LPCUST (−2.074)*, | |||||||
| Upper-middle-income LAC | |||||||
| GDP (0.8732)***, IND (0.482)**, | |||||||
| Lower-middle-income LAC | |||||||
Note(s): GDP (0.9885)***, FDI (0.2535)***, N = 25, ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1. Model 1 uses the general OLPI index (overall); model 2 uses the LPI customs index; model 3 uses the LPI infrastructure; model 4 uses the LPI quality of logistics services index; model 5 uses the LPI tracking and tracing index; model 6 uses the LPI timeliness. Coefficients are based on log-transformed variables and therefore reflect scaled associations rather than standardized beta coefficients
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.