Table 6

Comparisons between AHP and AHP-BWM results (average statistics)

Full sampleSub-sample (⁠CR≤0.1⁠)
AHPAHP-BWMAHPAHP-BWM
N=673N=673N=644N=662
CR0.17640.08800.04550.0090
MV0.07230.03000.05870.0407
TD0.06320.00480.01340.0016

Note(s): This table presents the average values of consistency ratio (⁠CR⁠), minimum violation (⁠MV⁠) and total deviation (⁠TD⁠) across different models (i.e. AHP versus AHP-BWM) and samples

Source(s): Author’s own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options