Table 8 Comparisons between AHP and...

Table 8

Comparisons between AHP and AHP-BWM results (dimensions)

	AHP results		AHP-BWM results
	Full sample	Sub-sample ( $C R \leq 0.1$ ⁠)	Full sample	Sub-sample ( $C R \leq 0.1$ )
	$N = 673$	$N = 644$	$N = 673$	$N = 662$
AGRO	0.34	0.17	0.15	0.16
SOTE	0.24	0.29	0.30	0.32
ECON	0.42	0.54	0.54	0.52

	AHP results	AHP-BWM results
AGRO	0.34	0.17	0.15	0.16
SOTE	0.24	0.29	0.30	0.32
ECON	0.42	0.54	0.54	0.52

Note(s): This table presents the estimated values (or weights) of the three dimensions of sustainable agriculture development, namely Agroecology (AGRO), Socio-territorial (SOTE) and Economic (ECON), across different models (i.e. AHP versus AHP-BWM) and samples

Source(s): Author’s own work

[ViewLarge]

	AHP results		AHP-BWM results
	Full sample	Sub-sample ( $C R \leq 0.1$ )	Full sample	Sub-sample ( $C R \leq 0.1$ )
	$N = 673$	$N = 644$	$N = 673$	$N = 662$
AGRO	0.34	0.17	0.15	0.16
SOTE	0.24	0.29	0.30	0.32
ECON	0.42	0.54	0.54	0.52

Sharing Unavailable