Observed three-month changes in work engagement, vigour, job resources and team crafting
| Participants in experiments vs. workers in the programme who did not experiment | Participants in experiments vs. workers not in the programme | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 1a | Model 2b | |
| Observed change in outcomes after 3 months | b (90%CI) | ATE (90%CI) | b (90%CI) | ATT (90%CI) |
| Work engagement | 0.12 (−0.16; 0.40) | 0.15 (−0.14; 0.44) | −0.10 (−0.28; 0.08) | −0.12 (−0.33; 0.09) |
| Vigour | 0.16 (−0.08; 0.41) | 0.15 (−0.10; 0.41) | −0.14 (−0.30; 0.01) | −0.17 (−0.35; 0.00) |
| Social support from colleagues | 0.35 (0.02; 0.68) | 0.46 (0.16; 0.76) | 0.23 (−0.00; 0.46) | 0.29 (0.03; 0.55) |
| Social support from supervisors | 0.26 (−0.13; 0.65) | 0.03 (−0.30; 0.36) | −0.31 (−0.61;−0.02) | −0.16 (−0.58; 0.27) |
| Coaching by supervisors | 0.17 (−0.21; 0.56) | −0.17 (−0.66; 0.33) | −0.08 (−0.33; 0.18) | −0.05 (−0.34; 0.24) |
| Feedback about work | 0.27 (−0.15; 0.68) | 0.19 (−0.26; 0.64) | 0.12 (−0.18; 0.41) | 0.11 (−0.22; 0.45) |
| Development opportunities | 0.41 (0.05; 0.77) | 0.20 (−0.19; 0.58) | 0.12 (−0.13; 0.37) | 0.27 (−0.02; 0.57) |
| Team crafting | 0.31 (−0.02; 0.64) | 0.16 (−0.15; 0.47) | 0.23 (0.03; 0.44) | 0.15 (−0.07; 0.36) |
| Participants in experiments vs. workers in the programme who did not experiment | Participants in experiments vs. workers not in the programme | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |
| Observed change in outcomes after 3 months | ||||
| Work engagement | 0.12 (−0.16; 0.40) | 0.15 (−0.14; 0.44) | −0.10 (−0.28; 0.08) | −0.12 (−0.33; 0.09) |
| Vigour | 0.16 (−0.08; 0.41) | 0.15 (−0.10; 0.41) | −0.14 (−0.30; 0.01) | −0.17 (−0.35; 0.00) |
| Social support from colleagues | 0.23 (−0.00; 0.46) | |||
| Social support from supervisors | 0.26 (−0.13; 0.65) | 0.03 (−0.30; 0.36) | −0.16 (−0.58; 0.27) | |
| Coaching by supervisors | 0.17 (−0.21; 0.56) | −0.17 (−0.66; 0.33) | −0.08 (−0.33; 0.18) | −0.05 (−0.34; 0.24) |
| Feedback about work | 0.27 (−0.15; 0.68) | 0.19 (−0.26; 0.64) | 0.12 (−0.18; 0.41) | 0.11 (−0.22; 0.45) |
| Development opportunities | 0.20 (−0.19; 0.58) | 0.12 (−0.13; 0.37) | 0.27 (−0.02; 0.57) | |
| Team crafting | 0.31 (−0.02; 0.64) | 0.16 (−0.15; 0.47) | 0.15 (−0.07; 0.36) | |
Note(s): CI = confidence interval, ATE = average treatment effect, ATT = average treatment effect on the treated
Italic highlights that the estimate is statistically significant at p < 0.1
Associations are adjusted for the corresponding baseline outcome variable
Kernel-based propensity score matching with automatic bandwidth selection + adjustment for a maximum of four covariates with the greatest imbalance
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.