Table 1.

Mapping AACSB research impact criteria to types of legitimacy

AACSB impactful research criterionPragmatic legitimacyMoral legitimacyCognitive legitimacy
Cross-disciplinary researchRecognized as useful to stakeholders who need solutions that are informed by insights and expertise from multiple fieldsSeen as an ethical response to complex problems that cannot be solved by one discipline aloneViewed as normal and expected when embedded in the institution’s mission and structures
Academic–practice integrationBuilds trust and support from local businesses, nonprofits and government through collaboration and research that responds to real-world needsPerceived as responsible because it bridges the gap between theory and action in addressing community needsUnderstood as a natural extension of the university’s mission when collaboration with practitioners is frequent and valued
Real-world changeProvides tangible benefits that stakeholders value, such as job creation or improved processesReflects a civic duty to serve society and improve communitiesBecomes part of the university’s identity when real change is routinely expected and recognized

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options