Description (summary from literature) references
| S. No | Factors | Drivers | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1- | Environmental Awareness and Knowledge | Environmental and Cognitive Drivers Knowledge and awareness are the base enablers to map the positive attitudes and decision-making. Less awareness and literacy remain the major barriers, while enhancing the adoption of eco-labels, transparent advertising, and educational campaigns positively influences | Adah and Ekweani (2025) |
| 2- | Environmental Concern and Attitude | To predict behavior change, a pro-sustainability mindset works well, while adopting an ecological responsibility forms a base for sustainable actions | Şener et al. (2023) |
| 3- | Ethical Values and Personal Norms | Moral identity and internalized environmental values sustain long-term commitment to green consumption | Şener et al. (2023), D'Arco et al. (2025) |
| 4- | Price and Affordability | Economic and Functional Barriers High price sensitivity, especially in emerging economies, deters adoption. Subsidies and economies of scale can transform affordability into an enabler | Reddy (2025), Zighan et al. (2026) |
| 5- | Product Availability and Accessibility | Limited shelf presence of green products lowers purchase likelihood. Improved distribution and supply-chain reach increase feasibility | Ovezmyradov (2022) |
| 6- | Convenience and Ease of Adoption | Complex buying or usage processes discourage behavior change. Simplifying packaging and logistics raises perceived convenience | Lisboa et al. (2022) |
| 7- | Social Norms and Peer Influence | Social and Psychological Influences Family, friends, and influencers create social proof that normalizes green behavior, functioning as a causal driver of sustainability diffusion | Duarte et al. (2024) |
| 8- | Personal and Social Image Effects | When eco-friendly products enhance prestige and self-image, sustainability becomes inspirational rather than a trade-off | Rodgers and Rousseau (2022) |
| 9- | Emotional and Ethical Motivations | Anticipated pride or guilt stimulates green purchasing. Moral appeals effectively activate pro-environmental intentions | Clark et al. (2022) |
| 10- | Government Policy and Incentives | Institutional and Technological Enablers Subsidies, labeling laws, and favorable import duties promote adoption. Lack of supportive regulation increases consumer cost | Olesson et al. (2023) |
| 11- | Cultural Values and Context | Collectivist cultures exhibit stronger sustainability norms. Aligning campaigns with local traditions enhances relevance | Willis et al. (2024) |
| 12- | Digital Technology and Media Influence | Social-media activism, influencer marketing, and mobile apps spread awareness, especially among younger consumers | Sharma et al. (2024) |
| 13- | Trust in Green Claims and Corporate CSR | Transparent eco-labels and consistent communication transform awareness into purchase action | Nguyen-Viet and Thanh Tran (2024) |
| 14- | Marketing, Information, and Labeling | Striking and nice-looking labeling increases the product's visibility and attractiveness on shelves for customers | Ryan et al. (2024) |
| 15- | Habits and Consumption Routine | Routine shopping patterns anchor unsustainable choices. Interventions like trial promotions or loyalty incentives can break inertia | More et al. (2025) |
| S. No | Factors | Drivers | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1- | Environmental Awareness and Knowledge | ||
| 2- | Environmental Concern and Attitude | To predict behavior change, a pro-sustainability mindset works well, while adopting an ecological responsibility forms a base for sustainable actions | |
| 3- | Ethical Values and Personal Norms | Moral identity and internalized environmental values sustain long-term commitment to green consumption | |
| 4- | Price and Affordability | ||
| 5- | Product Availability and Accessibility | Limited shelf presence of green products lowers purchase likelihood. Improved distribution and supply-chain reach increase feasibility | |
| 6- | Convenience and Ease of Adoption | Complex buying or usage processes discourage behavior change. Simplifying packaging and logistics raises perceived convenience | |
| 7- | Social Norms and Peer Influence | ||
| 8- | Personal and Social Image Effects | When eco-friendly products enhance prestige and self-image, sustainability becomes inspirational rather than a trade-off | |
| 9- | Emotional and Ethical Motivations | Anticipated pride or guilt stimulates green purchasing. Moral appeals effectively activate pro-environmental intentions | |
| 10- | Government Policy and Incentives | ||
| 11- | Cultural Values and Context | Collectivist cultures exhibit stronger sustainability norms. Aligning campaigns with local traditions enhances relevance | |
| 12- | Digital Technology and Media Influence | Social-media activism, influencer marketing, and mobile apps spread awareness, especially among younger consumers | |
| 13- | Trust in Green Claims and Corporate CSR | Transparent eco-labels and consistent communication transform awareness into purchase action | |
| 14- | Marketing, Information, and Labeling | Striking and nice-looking labeling increases the product's visibility and attractiveness on shelves for customers | |
| 15- | Habits and Consumption Routine | Routine shopping patterns anchor unsustainable choices. Interventions like trial promotions or loyalty incentives can break inertia |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.