A summary of the four pathways
| Reactive | Hybrid | Proactive | Opportunistic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source of awareness | External disruption or shock | Internal performance issues and pain points | Monitored internal performance and external sources | Recognition of market shifts or opportunities |
| Pace and duration of awareness and incubation | Fast; from immediate to a month | Slow; Accumulates during several months to multiple years | Varies; Awareness may build gradually, but incubation can proceed quickly due to systematic evaluations. Six months to a year | Varies; Awareness emerges gradually, but incubation can accelerate once an opportunity is identified. Dependent on the size and timing |
| Trigger | Disruptive external events | Accumulation of underperformance and pain points | Strategic assessment based on systematic evaluation | Attractive market opportunity |
| Type of initial evaluation | Gathering data, make or buy -, supplier -, and total cost evaluation, develop initial relocation scenarios. | Make or buy -, supplier -, and total cost evaluation, develop initial relocation scenarios. | Review, refine and compare existing continuous evaluation of drivers and scenarios | Supplier evaluation and targeted scenario and market evaluation to test feasibility of relocation scenarios |
| Relevance of initial evaluation | Highly relevant; regain control and establish viable response to disruptions | Relevant; If accumulated problems justify entering a formal relocation process | Moderately relevant; supports a structured start to the formal process | Relevant depending on assessment during the awareness stage |
| Prior experience and knowledge | Current- market knowledge may become irrelevant. Experience enables quicker initiation | Experience at current location increases awareness through interpretation of performance signals | Prior relocation and market experience are key enablers. Prior knowledge reduces uncertainty in decision-making | Experience of current, prior and intended market enables opportunity use and reduce the risk of misjudgement |
| Market commitment | Previously committed resources may quickly lose relevance | Strong market commitment can delay the trigger, extend the awareness and incubation strategies, but deepen experience | Proactive behaviour can both deliberately reinforce and temper market commitment | Changes in market commitment are central drivers for both maintaining and building commitment at current or intended market. |
| Suitability | Crises and emergencies | Firms attached to the current location without a relocation strategy | Firms seeking to stay ahead of competition, with sufficient capabilities and resources to invest | Firms pursuing market-driven expansion or repositioning |
| Reactive | Hybrid | Proactive | Opportunistic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source of awareness | External disruption or shock | Internal performance issues and pain points | Monitored internal performance and external sources | Recognition of market shifts or opportunities |
| Pace and duration of awareness and incubation | Fast; from immediate to a month | Slow; Accumulates during several months to multiple years | Varies; Awareness may build gradually, but incubation can proceed quickly due to systematic evaluations. Six months to a year | Varies; Awareness emerges gradually, but incubation can accelerate once an opportunity is identified. Dependent on the size and timing |
| Trigger | Disruptive external events | Accumulation of underperformance and pain points | Strategic assessment based on systematic evaluation | Attractive market opportunity |
| Type of initial evaluation | Gathering data, make or buy -, supplier -, and total cost evaluation, develop initial relocation scenarios. | Make or buy -, supplier -, and total cost evaluation, develop initial relocation scenarios. | Review, refine and compare existing continuous evaluation of drivers and scenarios | Supplier evaluation and targeted scenario and market evaluation to test feasibility of relocation scenarios |
| Relevance of initial evaluation | Highly relevant; regain control and establish viable response to disruptions | Relevant; If accumulated problems justify entering a formal relocation process | Moderately relevant; supports a structured start to the formal process | Relevant depending on assessment during the awareness stage |
| Prior experience and knowledge | Current- market knowledge may become irrelevant. Experience enables quicker initiation | Experience at current location increases awareness through interpretation of performance signals | Prior relocation and market experience are key enablers. Prior knowledge reduces uncertainty in decision-making | Experience of current, prior and intended market enables opportunity use and reduce the risk of misjudgement |
| Market commitment | Previously committed resources may quickly lose relevance | Strong market commitment can delay the trigger, extend the awareness and incubation strategies, but deepen experience | Proactive behaviour can both deliberately reinforce and temper market commitment | Changes in market commitment are central drivers for both maintaining and building commitment at current or intended market. |
| Suitability | Crises and emergencies | Firms attached to the current location without a relocation strategy | Firms seeking to stay ahead of competition, with sufficient capabilities and resources to invest | Firms pursuing market-driven expansion or repositioning |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.