Table 8. PROCESS Macro estimates of...

Table 8.

PROCESS Macro estimates of mediation analysis: the influence of financial advisors on perceived effectiveness

Model terms/effects	Coefficient	SE	t	p
Dependent variable: Info TOT
Constant	0.341	0.083	4.101	0.000
Advisor frequency	0.109	0.022	4.918	0.000
Dependent variable: PE
Constant	2.350	0.095	24.662	0.000
Advisor frequency	0.086	0.025	3.377	0.000
Info TOT	0.086	0.040	2.146	0.032
Dependent variable: ownership of SI
Constant	−5.097	0.510	−9.982	0.000
Advisor frequency	0.328	0.081	4.050	0.000
Info TOT	0.908	0.127	7.137	0.000
PE	0.796	0.127	6.252	0.000
Indirect effects of advisor on ownership of SI
	Effect	BootSE	BootLLCI	BootULCI
IND1 (AF → INFOT → SI)	0.099	0.025	0.055	0.156
IND2 (AF → PE → SI)	0.069	0.023	0.026	0.116
IND3 (AF → INFOT → PE → SI)	0.008	0.004	0.001	0.016

Model terms/effects	Coefficient	SE	t	p
Dependent variable: Info TOT
Constant	0.341	0.083	4.101	0.000
Advisor frequency	0.109	0.022	4.918	0.000
Dependent variable: PE
Constant	2.350	0.095	24.662	0.000
Advisor frequency	0.086	0.025	3.377	0.000
Info TOT	0.086	0.040	2.146	0.032
Dependent variable: ownership of SI
Constant	−5.097	0.510	−9.982	0.000
Advisor frequency	0.328	0.081	4.050	0.000
Info TOT	0.908	0.127	7.137	0.000
PE	0.796	0.127	6.252	0.000
Indirect effects of advisor on ownership of SI
	Effect	BootSE	BootLLCI	BootULCI
IND1 (AF → INFOT → SI)	0.099	0.025	0.055	0.156
IND2 (AF → PE → SI)	0.069	0.023	0.026	0.116
IND3 (AF → INFOT → PE → SI)	0.008	0.004	0.001	0.016

Note(s):

The effects have been estimated through bootstrap technique with 95% confidence intervals. Indirect effects (IND1 IND2 and IND3) can be considered statistically significant when the range between BootLLCI and BootULCI does not contain 0. In the bottom part of the table: AF = advisor frequency; INFOT = Info TOT; PE = perceived effectiveness; SI = ownership of SI

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable