Table 1

The moderating effect of provincial environmental corruption

ComplianceitResource efficiencyitEnvironmental initiativesitEPIit
Provincial corruptionjt (PC)−0.3080.588−22.58***−7.432***
(−0.10)(0.25)(−3.35)(−2.80)
Female presenceijt1.1330.3834.150**1.888**
(1.15)(0.52)(1.99)(2.30)
PCjt × Female presenceijt10.55**5.68812.179.471**
(2.22)(1.61)(1.21)(2.38)
Board independenceijt0.4530.1683.031**1.218**
(0.72)(0.36)(2.25)(2.30)
PCjt × Board independenceijt0.6512.5646.2443.152
(0.23)(1.20)(1.03)(1.31)
Board diversityijt−0.02420.1620.2830.141
(−0.17)(1.57)(0.96)(1.21)
PCjt × Board diversityijt−0.255−0.933**2.119*0.310
(−0.44)(−2.15)(1.71)(0.64)
Board sizeijt0.1350.127−0.1380.0410
(1.23)(1.57)(−0.60)(0.45)
PCjt × Board sizeijt0.1000.2342.298**0.878**
(0.23)(0.72)(2.47)(2.39)
Constant51.22***43.86***23.13***39.41***
(60.65)(69.73)(12.92)(55.77)
Other board characteristicsYesYesYesYes
Control variablesYesYesYesYes
Industry fixed-effectYesYesYesYes
Year fixed-effectYesYesYesYes
var(e.dependent variable)20.20***11.20***90.81***14.14***
(29.81)(29.87)(29.87)(29.87)
Observations1785178517851785

Note(s): The dependent variable is the environmental performance index (EPI). t-statistics in parentheses (*p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01)

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options