Table 5 Statistical finding and... | Emerald Publishing

Table 5

Statistical finding and theoretical interpretation

Statistical finding	Theoretical interpretation (discussion)
Training hours (⁠ $β = 0.68$ ⁠) and Leadership (⁠ $β = 0.57$ ⁠) strongly predict performance	Validates the Socio-Technical Systems perspective
The confusion matrix reports an 84% predictive accuracy for lean improvements	Confirms lean tools effectively stabilize predictable operational routines in volatile supply chains
Qualitative risk of “lean fatigue” and “superficial implementation”	Illustrates failed Dynamic Capabilities when treating lean as temporary cost-cutting rather than embedded routine transformation

Statistical finding	Theoretical interpretation (discussion)
Training hours ( $β = 0.68$ ) and Leadership ( $β = 0.57$ ) strongly predict performance	Validates the Socio-Technical Systems perspective
The confusion matrix reports an 84% predictive accuracy for lean improvements	Confirms lean tools effectively stabilize predictable operational routines in volatile supply chains
Qualitative risk of “lean fatigue” and “superficial implementation”	Illustrates failed Dynamic Capabilities when treating lean as temporary cost-cutting rather than embedded routine transformation