Table 1

Positioning relative to prior systematic and narrative reviews

ReviewScopeMethodKey limitationDistinction from this review
Cumming and Johan (2017) Entrepreneurial finance broadlyNarrative reviewNo systematic search protocolSystematic PRISMA protocol with explicit search strings and quality assessment
Block et al. (2018) Alternative financing mechanismsEditorialTheoretical fragmentation unaddressedCritical theoretical integration with testable propositions
Cumming et al. (2019) New directionsEditorialNo methodological critiqueMMAT quality assessment with inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.84)
Bellavitis et al. (2017) Funding innovationsEditorialConceptual rather than systematicEmpirical synthesis of 53 studies with thematic analysis (NVivo 12)
Wright, Lumpkin, Zott, and Agarwal (2016) Evolving landscapeEditorialPre-dates crowdfunding maturityPost-COVID evidence (2019–2024) with resilience implications
This review2012–2024, A/A* journalsPRISMA + MMATExcludes practitioner outletsDiagnoses entrepreneurial voice gap as structural problem; testable propositions; prioritized agenda; positionality statement

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal