Results summary of quality assessment
| Study type | Number assessed | Number passing (≥80%) | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | 06 | 06 | 100% |
| Quantitative nonrandomized | 47 | 42 | 89.4% |
| Mixed methods | 04 | 03 | 75.0% |
| Theoretical/conceptual | 03 | 02 | 66.7% |
| Total | 60 | 53 | 88.3% |
| Study type | Number assessed | Number passing (≥80%) | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | 06 | 06 | 100% |
| Quantitative nonrandomized | 47 | 42 | 89.4% |
| Mixed methods | 04 | 03 | 75.0% |
| Theoretical/conceptual | 03 | 02 | 66.7% |
Note(s): Note on editorial/conceptual papers: Block et al. (2018), Block, Groh, Hornuf, Vanacker, and Vismara (2021), Cumming et al. (2019) and Cumming and Johan (2017) were included despite not meeting standard MMAT criteria due to their foundational nature and high citation impact. Complete MMAT scores are provided in Appendix B
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.