Quality appraisal framework
| Assessment criterion | Reference(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Relevance | Tranfield et al. (2003) | Degree to which the study addressed algorithmic management, platform labour, informal learning, adaptive strategies or structural inequality |
| Methodological clarity | Tranfield et al. (2003) | Clarity of research design, sampling, data collection and analytical methods |
| Empirical depth | Lincoln and Guba (1985) | Richness, adequacy and credibility of empirical evidence |
| Contextual relevance | Petticrew and Roberts (2006) | Relevance to India or comparable global South gig economy contexts |
| Theoretical and analytical rigor | Tranfield et al. (2003) | Use of conceptual frameworks and coherence of interpretation |
| Transparency and credibility | Lincoln and Guba (1985) and Moher et al. (2009) | Acknowledgement of limitations, reflexivity and analytical transparency |
| Overall assessment | Tranfield et al. (2003) | Classified as high, moderate or limited rigor |
| Assessment criterion | Reference(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Relevance | Degree to which the study addressed algorithmic management, platform labour, informal learning, adaptive strategies or structural inequality | |
| Methodological clarity | Clarity of research design, sampling, data collection and analytical methods | |
| Empirical depth | Richness, adequacy and credibility of empirical evidence | |
| Contextual relevance | Relevance to India or comparable global South gig economy contexts | |
| Theoretical and analytical rigor | Use of conceptual frameworks and coherence of interpretation | |
| Transparency and credibility | Acknowledgement of limitations, reflexivity and analytical transparency | |
| Overall assessment | Classified as high, moderate or limited rigor |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.