Overview of qualitative themes and their quantitative referents
| Theme | Participants (n) | Quantitative referent | Mechanism illuminated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied comprehension | 18 / 24 | D3 dimension (d ≈ 3.66–3.85) | Recognition of the knowing–doing gap |
| Self-awareness | 21 / 24 | D2 dimension (d ≈ 3.22–3.60) | Identification of unexamined behavioral patterns |
| Process consciousness | 16 / 24 | D2/D3 (process facet) | Dual-level monitoring of task and group dynamics |
| Pressure management | 22 / 24 | SF3.4 subfactor (d ≈ 4.16–4.56) | Cognitive degradation under temporal constraint |
| Collaborative modes | 14 / 24 | Team-synergy variable | Interpersonal behaviors driving synergy outcomes |
| Affective regulation | 12 / 24 | SF2.4 (affective facet) | Emotional response under time pressure |
| Theme | Participants (n) | Quantitative referent | Mechanism illuminated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied comprehension | 18 / 24 | D3 dimension ( | Recognition of the knowing–doing gap |
| Self-awareness | 21 / 24 | D2 dimension ( | Identification of unexamined behavioral patterns |
| Process consciousness | 16 / 24 | D2/D3 (process facet) | Dual-level monitoring of task and group dynamics |
| Pressure management | 22 / 24 | SF3.4 subfactor ( | Cognitive degradation under temporal constraint |
| Collaborative modes | 14 / 24 | Team-synergy variable | Interpersonal behaviors driving synergy outcomes |
| Affective regulation | 12 / 24 | SF2.4 (affective facet) | Emotional response under time pressure |
Themes derived through reflexive thematic analysis with inter-coder reliability check (pooled Cohen’s κ = 0.73; 88.2% agreement). Detailed coefficients, the consensus matrix and the codebook are reported in Online Appendix C
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.