Table 3. Comparison of RA (%) and SA (%)...

Table 3.

Comparison of RA (%) and SA (%) of using the proposed methods based on the self-supervised TRADES under different $λ$ ⁠, self-supervised HAT and self-supervised AT where CIFAR-10 was used

Methods	RA	SA	$λ$
Ours (TRADES)	48.67	78.83	6
	49.36	78.67	12
	49.78	78.15	16
	50.04	78.52	18
	50.21	77.49	20
Ours (HAT)	50.39	79.98
Ours (AT)	51.15	78.90

Methods	RA	SA	$λ$
Ours (TRADES)	48.67	78.83	6
	49.36	78.67	12
	49.78	78.15	16
	50.04	78.52	18
	50.21	77.49	20
Ours (HAT)	50.39	79.98
Ours (AT)	51.15	78.90

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable