Table 7.

Comparison of Spearman’s rank correlation on the proposed method without/with AT compared to the previous methods. The last four rows show our results.Supervised (S) and unsupervised (U) settings were evaluated on STS datasets

Methods S/USTS12STS13STS14STS15STS16STSBSICKRAvg.
SBERT (Reimers and Gurevych, 2019)S70.9776.5373.1979.0974.3077.0372.9174.89
SBERT-flow (Li et al., 2020a)S69.7877.2774.3582.0177.4679.1276.2176.60
SBERT-whitening (Su et al., 2021)S69.6577.5774.6682.2778.3979.5276.9177.00
BERT (Devlin et al., 2019)U39.7059.3849.6766.0366.1953.8762.0656.70
CT-BERT (Carlsson et al., 2021)U61.6376.8068.4777.5076.4874.3169.1972.05
ConSERT (Yan et al., 2021)U64.6478.4969.0779.7275.9573.9767.3172.74
SG-BERT (Kim et al., 2021)U66.8480.1371.2381.5677.1777.2368.1674.62
SimCSE (Gao et al., 2021)U68.4082.4174.3880.9178.5676.8572.2376.25
SimCSE*U67.3881.2973.1580.9578.0177.0470.3575.45
Ours (SimCSE, p=0.2)U68.7980.8373.3881.6078.9278.2072.8976.37
Ours (SimCSE, pw=0.1,ps=0.2)U70.3080.9773.3382.0579.3578.8871.6976.65
Ours (SimCSE, pw=0,ps=0.3)U70.1981.9773.9681.7279.2478.2871.8176.74
Ours (AT, pw=0,ps=0.3)U71.6782.4574.3282.9280.0279.9573.2977.80

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal