The Three pillars of Industry 5.0 and their implications for management education
| Industry 5.0 pillar | Definition | Organizational example | Management education implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human-centricity | Human-centricity means that technological and organizational systems should be designed around human agency, dignity, well-being, creativity and meaningful participation rather than treating people mainly as inputs to be optimized. In Industry 5.0, technology should augment human capabilities and support better work, rather than simply replace labor or intensify control (Breque et al., 2021; Ivanov, 2023; Mentzas et al., 2024) | A firm adopting AI for workforce planning would not only ask whether the system improves efficiency, but also whether it preserves employee voice, protects autonomy, reduces bias, improves work quality and supports human judgment in decision-making | Management education should teach students to evaluate technologies and organizational practices through questions of dignity, agency, inclusion and well-being. For example, students might analyze an AI-enabled decision system by asking who has authority, whose interests are represented, what forms of bias may be embedded and whether the technology augments or diminishes human judgment |
| Sustainability | Sustainability means that industrial and organizational activity should operate within ecological limits and contribute to long-term social and environmental value. In Industry 5.0, sustainability is not an add-on to efficiency, but a core design principle that connects innovation, production, consumption and governance to planetary and societal well-being (Breque et al., 2021; Ghobakhloo et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2021) | A manufacturer redesigning its supply chain would consider not only cost and speed, but also emissions, circularity, resource use, labor conditions, community impacts and long-term environmental resilience | Management education should move sustainability from specialist electives into core decision-making. Students should learn to assess business models, supply chains, innovation strategies and digital systems in terms of ecological consequences, stakeholder effects, intergenerational responsibility and long-term viability |
| Resilience | Resilience refers to the capacity of socio-technical systems to absorb disruption, adapt, learn and continue functioning without sacrificing human well-being or sustainability. Industry 5.0 extends resilience beyond operational continuity by linking it to adaptability, social robustness and responsible responses to uncertainty (Breque et al., 2021; Folke et al., 2010; Ivanov, 2023) | An organization facing a supply chain shock would not only seek a rapid return to normal operations, but would also redesign its processes to reduce future vulnerability, protect workers, maintain stakeholder trust and avoid shifting risk onto weaker actors | Management education should prepare students to lead through uncertainty, disruption and complexity. This could involve scenario-based assessments, crisis simulations, stakeholder negotiations and reflective exercises in which students must balance continuity, adaptation, ethical responsibility and long-term system health |
| Integrating the three pillars | Industry 5.0 is strongest when the three pillars are treated as interdependent. Human-centricity without sustainability may become narrow employee well-being; sustainability without human-centricity may become technocratic environmental management; and resilience without either may become simple survival or risk management. The value of Industry 5.0 lies in integrating all three into a broader model of responsible socio-technical development (Breque et al., 2021; Ghobakhloo et al., 2023; Ivanov, 2023) | A city, university or company adopting digital platforms would assess whether these systems improve human participation, reduce environmental harm and strengthen institutional capacity to respond to shocks | Management education should therefore avoid treating the pillars as separate topics. Programs should design learning experiences in which students must consider people, planet, technology and institutional adaptability together, for example, through live projects, sustainability audits, AI governance cases or co-created community partnerships |
| Industry 5.0 pillar | Definition | Organizational example | Management education implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human-centricity | Human-centricity means that technological and organizational systems should be designed around human agency, dignity, well-being, creativity and meaningful participation rather than treating people mainly as inputs to be optimized. In Industry 5.0, technology should augment human capabilities and support better work, rather than simply replace labor or intensify control ( | A firm adopting | Management education should teach students to evaluate technologies and organizational practices through questions of dignity, agency, inclusion and well-being. For example, students might analyze an AI-enabled decision system by asking who has authority, whose interests are represented, what forms of bias may be embedded and whether the technology augments or diminishes human judgment |
| Sustainability | Sustainability means that industrial and organizational activity should operate within ecological limits and contribute to long-term social and environmental value. In Industry 5.0, sustainability is not an add-on to efficiency, but a core design principle that connects innovation, production, consumption and governance to planetary and societal well-being ( | A manufacturer redesigning its supply chain would consider not only cost and speed, but also emissions, circularity, resource use, labor conditions, community impacts and long-term environmental resilience | Management education should move sustainability from specialist electives into core decision-making. Students should learn to assess business models, supply chains, innovation strategies and digital systems in terms of ecological consequences, stakeholder effects, intergenerational responsibility and long-term viability |
| Resilience | Resilience refers to the capacity of socio-technical systems to absorb disruption, adapt, learn and continue functioning without sacrificing human well-being or sustainability. Industry 5.0 extends resilience beyond operational continuity by linking it to adaptability, social robustness and responsible responses to uncertainty ( | An organization facing a supply chain shock would not only seek a rapid return to normal operations, but would also redesign its processes to reduce future vulnerability, protect workers, maintain stakeholder trust and avoid shifting risk onto weaker actors | Management education should prepare students to lead through uncertainty, disruption and complexity. This could involve scenario-based assessments, crisis simulations, stakeholder negotiations and reflective exercises in which students must balance continuity, adaptation, ethical responsibility and long-term system health |
| Integrating the three pillars | Industry 5.0 is strongest when the three pillars are treated as interdependent. Human-centricity without sustainability may become narrow employee well-being; sustainability without human-centricity may become technocratic environmental management; and resilience without either may become simple survival or risk management. The value of Industry 5.0 lies in integrating all three into a broader model of responsible socio-technical development ( | A city, university or company adopting digital platforms would assess whether these systems improve human participation, reduce environmental harm and strengthen institutional capacity to respond to shocks | Management education should therefore avoid treating the pillars as separate topics. Programs should design learning experiences in which students must consider people, planet, technology and institutional adaptability together, for example, through live projects, sustainability audits, |
The three pillars follow the European Commission’s Industry 5.0 framing of human-centricity, sustainability and resilience (Breque et al., 2021). The table translates these pillars into implications for management education
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.