Structural recommendations identified in the three case studies
| Audit | Structural recommendations with transformative potential |
|---|---|
| Social benefits (EUR 978 million) | Define benefit objectives with targets and indicators enabling accountability and evidence-based decisions |
| Integrate information systems enabling real-time cross-database verification and transparent data traceability | |
| Reduce provision complexity; eliminate separation between state pensions and guaranteed citizenship income | |
| Implement automated beneficiary verification and database integration preventing structural payment failures | |
| Renal care (378,350 sessions) | Approve updated strategic plan renewing prevalence projections and care level definitions, update haemodialysis centre location criteria |
| Estimate the cost of different dialysis services and update tariffs paid to various service providers | |
| Re-evaluate peritoneal and home haemodialysis tariffs to facilitate hospital provision of home-based techniques | |
| Extend maximum wait-time guarantees to vascular access interventions; accelerate arteriovenous fistula placement | |
| Hospital service compensation (54.20% of care expenditure, excluding COVID-19 funding) | Establish uniform provider unit criteria: each unit must correspond to one acute hospital facility |
| Promote modification whereby hospital discharge pricing is grounded in a case-complexity-centred payment model using case-mix weights estimated from actual costs, with necessary adjustments for centre structure factors | |
| Develop uniform analytical accounting framework for all regional hospital network acute hospitals to enable reliable estimations of actual regional hospital costs, replacing current US-based cost estimates for accurate case-mix weighting |
| Audit | Structural recommendations with transformative potential |
|---|---|
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.