Table 1

Relationship between attribute levels and supporting literature used in the synthesized hierarchy of functional and symbolic product attributes for activewear design for AAW model

Attribute levelAttribute definitionPrior terminology usedSupporting citations
Potential attributesFuture-oriented opportunities for innovation, anticipating emerging needs and technological possibilitiesLevitt (1980) defined this as “potential product”de Oliveira et al. (2018)
Lindgreen et al. (2012)
Bhagya et al. (2024) 
Unexpected attributesValue-added features that exceed expectations, create delight, and enhance emotional/symbolic experienceLevitt (1980) defined this as “augmented product”. Kotler and Armstrong (2004) defined this as “augmented product”. Brechan (2005) identified these as “tertiary attributes”Adiele and Amue (2012)
Trendafilov (2016)
Voss et al. (2008) 
Expected attributesFeatures consumers assume will be present based on norms and prior experience; reinforce trust and reliabilityAligns with Levitt's (1980) “expected product”, Kotler and Armstrong's (2004) “actual product”, and Brechan's (2005) “secondary attributes”Lin and Lekhawipat (2014), O'Sullivan et al. (2017) 
Essential attributesCore benefits and primary functions required for product viability and basic problem-solvingLevitt (1980) defined this as “generic product” and Kotler and Armstrong (2004) defined this as the “core product”. Brechan (2005) framed these as “primary attributes”Schmidt (2010)
Voss et al. (2008) 
Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options