Table 1.

Selected past literature on LPs

Authors ThemeTheory/frameworkMethodologyKey findings
This researchLP engagement
  • Social exchange theory

  • Customers’ disposition towards engagement framework

Quantitative
  • Customers’ disposition towards engagement framework is used to understand LP engagement

  • Perceived benefits and temporal price search positively impact LP engagement which, in turn, influences engagement with retailer

  • A combination of trust, commitment and perceived benefit is the key configuration whose presence and absence determines the enhancement or impediment of LP engagement

  • LP engagement is the key condition, the presence and absence of which (in combination with other conditions) drives the enhancement or impediment of engagement with retailer

Bruneau et al. (2018) LP engagementMixed method
  • LP engagement is a multi-dimensional construct

  • LP engagement positively impacts company engagement

Meyer-Waarden et al. (2023) LP engagementRelationship marketingQuantitative
  • LP perceived value (Financial value, personalisation value, preferential treatment value, exploration/hedonistic) impacts LP engagement

Ashley et al. (2016) LP engagementExpectancy value theoryQuantitative
  • Pricing of loyalty programme and denomination of accrual affect customer perception and engagement towards LP

Li et al. (2025) LP redemptionQuantitative
  • Point redemptions in other stores of different chains positively (negatively) affect the focal store’s point redemptions

Li et al. (2024) LP redemptionService management theoryQuantitative
  • Customer relationship characteristics in loyalty programmes (i.e. purchase depth, purchase breadth, purchase recency, redemption depth, redemption breadth and redemption recency) impact customers’ point redemption behaviour

Bies et al. (2021) LP redemptionQuantitative
  • Mobile push messages positively impact redemption behaviour

Chun and Hamilton (2024) LP redemptionQuantitative
  • Stability of the exchange rate influences point redemption

Hwang et al. (2016) LP redemptionQuantitative
  • Online channels increase redemption likelihood

  • Age is inversely related to redemption behaviour

Bombaij and Dekimpe (2020) LP designQuantitative
  • LP design, retailer and country characteristics moderate the impact of LP on a retailer’s sales productivity

Chaudhuri et al. (2019) LP designSocial exchange and motivational mechanismsQuantitative
  • Introducing an LP can increase sales and gross profits in the short term, and these positive effects are sustained in the long term

Kim et al. (2021) LP effectivenessComprehensive theory of loyalty programme dynamicsQualitative
  • LP effectiveness consists of psychological, design and operational elements that account for differential effects across customer acquisition, onboarding, expansion and retention stages

Khodakarami et al. (2024) LP effectivenessGoal shielding theoryQuantitative
  • Customer’s purchase at the focal firm is affected by the customer’s purchases and redemptions across competing firms

Zhang and Liu-Thompkins (2024) LP effectivenessConstrual level theoryQuantitative
  • Tier level and goal distance jointly determine loyalty programme members’ reaction to cognitive vs affective email appeals and the associated underlying process

Steinhoff and Palmatier (2016) LP effectivenessQuantitative
  • Loyalty programmes positively influence target customers by enhancing their sense of gratitude and perceived status, leading to increased loyalty and sales

  • Bystander customers may experience feelings of unfairness and diminished status, potentially reduce their loyalty and purchasing behaviour

Esmark et al. (2016) LP entry method
  • Social identity theory

  • Self-determination theory

  • Social exchange theory

Quantitative
  • Open loyalty programmes lead to more in-group identification whereas selective programmes lead to more gratitude

  • Loyalty programmes that are visible lead to more in-group identification

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal