Table 8.

Configurations as per equation (1) for high and low scores of LP engagement

Configurations of the antecedents forpredicting high score of LP engagementRCUCCConfigurations of the antecedents forpredicting low score of LP engagementRCUCC
(1) ∼CTrust*CPBnefit*CTemporalPS(2) CTrust*CCommit*CPBnefit(3) CCommit*CPBnefit*CSpatialPS(4) CCommit*CTemporalPS*CSpatialPS(5) CPBnefit*CTemporalPS*CSpatialPSSolution coverage: 0.884Solution consistency: 0.920.600.780.710.690.710.0050.090.0060.0140.0060.960.940.960.960.96(1) ∼CPBnefit*∼CTemporalPS(2) ∼CCommit*∼CTemporalPS*∼CSpatialPS(3) ∼CTrust*∼CTemporalPS*∼CSpatialPS(4) ∼CTrust*∼CCommit*∼CTemporalPS(5) ∼CTrust*∼CCommit*∼CPBnefit(6) ∼CCommit*∼CPBnefit*CSpatialPSSolution coverage: 0.90Solution consistency: 0.900.790.710.690.720.780.650.030.0050.0070.0030.0140.010.950.950.960.960.930.93
Note(s):

RC = raw coverage; UC = unique coverage; C = consistency; CTrust = trust; CCommit = commitment; CPBnefit = perceived benefit; CTemporalPS = temporal price search; CSpatialPS = spatial price search

[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal