Table 1 Confirmatory factor analyses of...

Table 1

Confirmatory factor analyses of measurement models

Model	$χ^{2} (d f)$	$d f$	$χ^{2} / d f$	CFI	TLI	RMSEA
M0: Hypothesized six-factor model	1048.556	505	2.076	0.922	0.913	0.064
M1: Five-factor model combining self-determined motivation and non-self-determined motivation into one factor	2191.622	730	3.002	0.812	0.799	0.087
M2: Five-factor model combining quantitative job insecurity and qualitative job insecurity into one factor	3083.436	730	4.224	0.698	0.677	0.110
M3: One-factor model	5025.821	740	6.792	0.449	0.419	0.148

Model	$χ^{2} (d f)$	$d f$	$χ^{2} / d f$	CFI	TLI	RMSEA
M0: Hypothesized six-factor model	1048.556	505	2.076	0.922	0.913	0.064
M1: Five-factor model combining self-determined motivation and non-self-determined motivation into one factor	2191.622	730	3.002	0.812	0.799	0.087
M2: Five-factor model combining quantitative job insecurity and qualitative job insecurity into one factor	3083.436	730	4.224	0.698	0.677	0.110
M3: One-factor model	5025.821	740	6.792	0.449	0.419	0.148

Note(s): N = 267. All chi-square values are significant at p < 0.01. The six-factor model is the hypothesized model, with all six measures loading on separate factors. CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis Index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable