Table 2

Results for regressions on knowledge transfer

VariablesModel 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5
Constant5.21*** (8.15)7.55*** (8.94)4.96*** (5.49)6.32*** (13.54)6.25*** (7.07)
Local firm0.24 (0.76)−0.18 (−0.62)−0.02 (−0.06)−0.11 (−0.48)0.05 (0.25)
Firm size0.00 (0.45)−0.00 (−0.51)−0.00 (−1.46)−0.00 (−0.13)−0.00 (−0.97)
Firm age0.01(0.73)0.01(1.30)0.01 (1.66)0.01 (1.39)0.01† (1.76)
Brokerage0.01 (0.02)−2.13* (−2.58)−1.41† (−1.80)−1.66* (−2.28)−0.95(−1.12)
Direct effect
(H1) Firm centrality7.54** (2.75)4.98† (1.78)5.80* (2.07)3.27(1.08)
(H2) Tie strength0.35* (2.31)0.30* (2.35)0.14(1.53)0.17† (1.72)
Organizational unlearning0.59*** (4.13)0.69*** (5.11)0.58*** (4.88)0.65*** (6.99)
Moderating effect
(H3) Firm centrality x3.87*3.84**
Organizational unlearning(2.02)(2.59)
(H4) Tie strength x−0.31*−0.26*
Organizational unlearning(−2.14)(−2.31)
F value0.599.42***9.66***10.75***11.43***
F change20.00***4.50*7.48**6.94**
Adjusted R2−0.040.590.630.650.70
R2 change0.600.040.060.10
Note(s):

n = 42. Unstandardized coefficients reported;t statistics in parentheses; Robust t statistics based on HC2 standard errors are reported for Model 3–5., † p < 0.10, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 (2-tailed)

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options