Table 1. FAD scores and average cosine... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1.

FAD scores and average cosine similarities based on PANNs embeddings between the set of reference explosion sounds and the synthesized sound set from PronounSE, T-Foley and Stable Audio 2.0. The ± indicates the standard deviation

	FAD scores by PANNs $↓$			Cosine similarity $\pm$ SD $↑$
Speaker ID	TF (Chung et al., 2024)	Ours	SA2 (Evans et al., 2024)	TF (Chung et al., 2024)	Ours	SA2 (Evans et al., 2024)
m-01	54.02	$17.85$	21.35	$0.73 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.08$	$0.83 \pm 0.06$
m-02	54.47	$17.05$	20.94	$0.74 \pm 0.07$	$0.86 \pm 0.06$	$0.84 \pm 0.06$
m-03	48.85	$17.28$	20.95	$0.75 \pm 0.07$	$0.86 \pm 0.07$	$0.84 \pm 0.06$
m-04	48.52	$16.65$	21.46	$0.75 \pm 0.08$	$0.85 \pm 0.07$	$0.84 \pm 0.06$
m-05	47.89	$19.29$	19.75	$0.75 \pm 0.08$	$0.86 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.07$
f-01	56.94	$19.28$	22.01	$0.72 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.06$
Whole	55.93	$14.09$	21.15	$0.74 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.07$	$0.84 \pm 0.06$

	FAD scores by PANNs $↓$			Cosine similarity $\pm$ SD $↑$
Speaker ID	TF (Chung et al., 2024)	Ours	SA2 (Evans et al., 2024)	TF (Chung et al., 2024)	Ours	SA2 (Evans et al., 2024)
m-01	54.02	$17.85$	21.35	$0.73 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.08$	$0.83 \pm 0.06$
m-02	54.47	$17.05$	20.94	$0.74 \pm 0.07$	$0.86 \pm 0.06$	$0.84 \pm 0.06$
m-03	48.85	$17.28$	20.95	$0.75 \pm 0.07$	$0.86 \pm 0.07$	$0.84 \pm 0.06$
m-04	48.52	$16.65$	21.46	$0.75 \pm 0.08$	$0.85 \pm 0.07$	$0.84 \pm 0.06$
m-05	47.89	$19.29$	19.75	$0.75 \pm 0.08$	$0.86 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.07$
f-01	56.94	$19.28$	22.01	$0.72 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.06$
Whole	55.93	$14.09$	21.15	$0.74 \pm 0.07$	$0.85 \pm 0.07$	$0.84 \pm 0.06$