Table 3 Summary of PROCESS macro models...

Table 3

Summary of PROCESS macro models (full sample; n = 379)

Hypothesised relationship		Direct effect	95% CI	Indirect effect	95% CI	Adj-R²	H₀ supp.?
H1a	xy PO → x PE	0.111	[0.094, 0.128]	–	–	0.302	✔
H1b	xy PO → y PE	0.124	[0.109, 0.140]	–	–	0.386	✔
H2a	xy PO → x NE	−0.007	[−0.022, 0.008]	–	–	0.003	✘
H2b	xy PO → y NE	0.006	[−0.009, 0.020]	–	–	0.002	✘
H3a	xy PO → x TER → y NE	−0.029	[−0.045, −0.012]	0.026	[0.015, 0.037]	0.077	✔^a
H3b	xy PO → x TER → x PE	0.026	[0.013, 0.039]	0.084	[0.073, 0.098]	0.715	✔^a
H4a	xy PO → y APA → x PE	0.154	[0.137, 0.171]	−0.043	[−0.056, −0.033]	0.458	✔^a
H4b	xy PO → x APA → y PE	0.162	[0.149, 0.176]	−0.038	[−0.048, −0.029]	0.620	✔^a

Hypothesised relationship		Direct effect	95% CI	Indirect effect	95% CI	Adj-R²	H₀ supp.?
H1a	xy PO → x PE	0.111	[0.094, 0.128]	–	–	0.302	✔
H1b	xy PO → y PE	0.124	[0.109, 0.140]	–	–	0.386	✔
H2a	xy PO → x NE	−0.007	[−0.022, 0.008]	–	–	0.003	✘
H2b	xy PO → y NE	0.006	[−0.009, 0.020]	–	–	0.002	✘
H3a	xy PO → x TER → y NE	−0.029	[−0.045, −0.012]	0.026	[0.015, 0.037]	0.077	✔^a
H3b	xy PO → x TER → x PE	0.026	[0.013, 0.039]	0.084	[0.073, 0.098]	0.715	✔^a
H4a	xy PO → y APA → x PE	0.154	[0.137, 0.171]	−0.043	[−0.056, −0.033]	0.458	✔^a
H4b	xy PO → x APA → y PE	0.162	[0.149, 0.176]	−0.038	[−0.048, −0.029]	0.620	✔^a

Note(s): PO = Psychological ownership; PE = Positively valenced engagement; TER = Territoriality;

NE = Negatively valenced engagement; APA = Apathy

Indicates partial mediation

Source(s): Authors’ own work

Sharing Unavailable