Iterative coding and analytical development across the hybrid forums
| First-cycle coding and initial observations | Emerging concerns, practices and organisational tensions | Second-cycle analytical development | Participatory and material data sources | Analytical and theoretical contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concerns and challenges: Initial coding captured recurring references to rising costs, staffing pressures, organisational precarity, funding concerns and operational uncertainty across the workshops 322 references | Participants frequently discussed organisational sustainability, workforce pressures, relevance, leadership and the challenge of balancing mission-driven priorities with increasing economic pressures | Concerns were interpreted not as isolated operational problems, but as interconnected organisational tensions shaping how NPAOs responded to uncertainty, negotiated value, and articulated organisational futures Key words included: rising costs, relevance, funding, leadership; development of organisational models including “firefighting”, “bums on seats”, “keeping the lights on” and “data culture” | Workshop transcripts, facilitator notes, participant reflections, collaborative discussions, scenario exercises | Supported analysis of how hybrid forums surfaced and sustained collective concern-work surrounding organisational change, precarity and evaluative pressures |
| Practices: Coding focused on references to organisational routines, reporting, benchmarking, audience engagement, programming and decision-making practices 611 references | Participants described both routine and strategic practices surrounding data use, reporting, programming decisions and audience development activities | Organisational practices became understood as socio-technical and relational arrangements through which data practices became embedded within everyday organisational decision-making | Workshop transcripts, collaborative Miro boards, participant annotations, organisational reflections | Contributed to analysis of data as embedded organisational practice rather than a neutral technical resource |
| Data: Initial coding captured references to reporting systems, dashboards, benchmarking tools, evidence practices and institutional uses of data 337 references | Data was frequently discussed in relation to organisational accountability, strategic planning, benchmarking and operational sustainability | Data was interpreted as a performative organisational device shaping how organisations understood audiences, justified decisions and negotiated future organisational priorities | Benchmarking workshops, pricing scenarios, participant-generated materials, facilitator reflections | Supported findings relating to performativity, organisational valuation and the infrastructural role of data practices |
| Time: Coding identified recurring references to time scarcity, overwork, “firefighting”, and tensions between strategic and creative labour 64 references | Participants reflected on limited time for creativity, planning, experimentation and long-term organisational thinking under conditions of uncertainty | Time emerged as an organisational and evaluative resource linked to visibility, capacity, strategic decision-making and the pressures of digital transformation | Participant reflections, workshop discussions, reflexive memos, facilitator observations | Contributed to analysis of how organisational pressures shaped responses to data-driven and evaluative demands |
| Problem-solving and organisational responses: Coding focused on collaborative discussion surrounding organisational adaptation, experimentation and responses to sectoral challenges 309 references | Participants collectively explored pricing strategies, audience engagement approaches, benchmarking practices and operational adjustments | Problem-solving practices were interpreted as collective negotiations through which participants explored possible organisational responses and future-oriented strategies under conditions of uncertainty | Scenario exercises, collaborative boards, workshop artefacts, pricing and benchmarking discussions | Supported analysis of hybrid forums as participatory and future-oriented methodological spaces enabling collective negotiation of organisational possibilities |
| First-cycle coding and initial observations | Emerging concerns, practices and organisational tensions | Second-cycle analytical development | Participatory and material data sources | Analytical and theoretical contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants frequently discussed organisational sustainability, workforce pressures, relevance, leadership and the challenge of balancing mission-driven priorities with increasing economic pressures | Concerns were interpreted not as isolated operational problems, but as interconnected organisational tensions shaping how NPAOs responded to uncertainty, negotiated value, and articulated organisational futures Key words included: rising costs, relevance, funding, leadership; development of organisational models including “firefighting”, “bums on seats”, “keeping the lights on” and “data culture” | Workshop transcripts, facilitator notes, participant reflections, collaborative discussions, scenario exercises | Supported analysis of how hybrid forums surfaced and sustained collective concern-work surrounding organisational change, precarity and evaluative pressures | |
| Participants described both routine and strategic practices surrounding data use, reporting, programming decisions and audience development activities | Organisational practices became understood as socio-technical and relational arrangements through which data practices became embedded within everyday organisational decision-making | Workshop transcripts, collaborative Miro boards, participant annotations, organisational reflections | Contributed to analysis of data as embedded organisational practice rather than a neutral technical resource | |
| Data was frequently discussed in relation to organisational accountability, strategic planning, benchmarking and operational sustainability | Data was interpreted as a performative organisational device shaping how organisations understood audiences, justified decisions and negotiated future organisational priorities | Benchmarking workshops, pricing scenarios, participant-generated materials, facilitator reflections | Supported findings relating to performativity, organisational valuation and the infrastructural role of data practices | |
| Participants reflected on limited time for creativity, planning, experimentation and long-term organisational thinking under conditions of uncertainty | Time emerged as an organisational and evaluative resource linked to visibility, capacity, strategic decision-making and the pressures of digital transformation | Participant reflections, workshop discussions, reflexive memos, facilitator observations | Contributed to analysis of how organisational pressures shaped responses to data-driven and evaluative demands | |
| Participants collectively explored pricing strategies, audience engagement approaches, benchmarking practices and operational adjustments | Problem-solving practices were interpreted as collective negotiations through which participants explored possible organisational responses and future-oriented strategies under conditions of uncertainty | Scenario exercises, collaborative boards, workshop artefacts, pricing and benchmarking discussions | Supported analysis of hybrid forums as participatory and future-oriented methodological spaces enabling collective negotiation of organisational possibilities |
Codes developed iteratively across transcripts, workshop artefacts, collaborative Miro boards, facilitator notes and reflexive memos
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.