Extending corporate political power into nationalist marketing
| Existing IB insight | Extension through marketing | Discursive mechanism | Political consequence | Future research question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firms do not only respond to political environments, but help shape them | Firms use marketing to translate nationalist politics into consumer-facing claims | National symbols, origin labels, patriotic stories and consumer identity appeals | Consumer choice becomes framed as national loyalty | How do firms use marketing to shape consumer understandings of nation, loyalty and foreignness? |
| Foreignness is a liability for internationalising firms | Domestic firms may actively make competitors appear more foreign or less legitimate | Emphasis on ownership, origin, supply chains, workers or cultural distance | Foreign competitors become framed as threats rather than ordinary market actors | How do firms impose or amplify liability of foreignness through marketing? |
| Corporate political activity is usually studied through lobbying, donations and regulation | Marketing can also operate as corporate political activity | Branding, advertising and social media shape public meanings | Corporate self-interest can be presented as national protection | When does marketing become a form of discursive corporate political activity? |
| Populist politics politicises trade, investment and foreignness | Nationalist marketing carries this politicisation into everyday consumption | Appeals to fear, resentment, pride and belonging | Markets become arenas for political identity | How do consumers respond when buying is framed as loyalty to the nation? |
| Existing | Extension through marketing | Discursive mechanism | Political consequence | Future research question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firms do not only respond to political environments, but help shape them | Firms use marketing to translate nationalist politics into consumer-facing claims | National symbols, origin labels, patriotic stories and consumer identity appeals | Consumer choice becomes framed as national loyalty | How do firms use marketing to shape consumer understandings of nation, loyalty and foreignness? |
| Foreignness is a liability for internationalising firms | Domestic firms may actively make competitors appear more foreign or less legitimate | Emphasis on ownership, origin, supply chains, workers or cultural distance | Foreign competitors become framed as threats rather than ordinary market actors | How do firms impose or amplify liability of foreignness through marketing? |
| Corporate political activity is usually studied through lobbying, donations and regulation | Marketing can also operate as corporate political activity | Branding, advertising and social media shape public meanings | Corporate self-interest can be presented as national protection | When does marketing become a form of discursive corporate political activity? |
| Populist politics politicises trade, investment and foreignness | Nationalist marketing carries this politicisation into everyday consumption | Appeals to fear, resentment, pride and belonging | Markets become arenas for political identity | How do consumers respond when buying is framed as loyalty to the nation? |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.