Managerial decision recommendations under supplier dominance
| Supply condition | Dominant risk | Objective | Managerial decisions | Strategies to prioritize | Strategies to avoid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadrant 1: High urgency × Low substitutability | Immediate supply disruption with no viable alternatives | Secure access and preferential treatment | Accept dependence on a key supplier to ensure priority access rather than pursuing unrealistic diversification | Access-preserving strategies: Sole sourcing, preferred customer positioning, bargaining power, long-term relational contracts, vertical integration | Diversification-oriented strategies: back-up sourcing |
| Quadrant 2: High urgency × High substitutability | Immediate disruption but alternatives exist | Enable rapid switching | Relax specifications and activate alternative suppliers to maintain operational continuity | Substitution-oriented strategies: Specification assessment, recipe reformulation | Relational lock-in strategies: sole sourcing, deep relational commitment, long planning horizons |
| Quadrant 3: Low urgency × Low substitutability | Long-term vulnerability to dominant suppliers | Build structural resilience | Invest in developing alternative suppliers over time while maintaining the dominant relationship | Diversification-oriented strategies: Back-up sourcing, gradual supplier development, coalition-building | Short-term adaptation strategies: specification assessment |
| Quadrant 4: Low urgency × High substitutability | Cost volatility rather than existential risk | Optimize cost and flexibility | Leverage market mechanisms and contracts rather than relational dependence | Contractual strategies: Intelligent deal structures, financial hedging, forward contracts | Access-preserving strategies: bargaining power development, preferred-customer positioning |
| Supply condition | Dominant risk | Objective | Managerial decisions | Strategies to prioritize | Strategies to avoid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadrant 1: High urgency × Low substitutability | Immediate supply disruption with no viable alternatives | Secure access and preferential treatment | Accept dependence on a key supplier to ensure priority access rather than pursuing unrealistic diversification | ||
| Quadrant 2: High urgency × High substitutability | Immediate disruption but alternatives exist | Enable rapid switching | Relax specifications and activate alternative suppliers to maintain operational continuity | ||
| Quadrant 3: Low urgency × Low substitutability | Long-term vulnerability to dominant suppliers | Build structural resilience | Invest in developing alternative suppliers over time while maintaining the dominant relationship | ||
| Quadrant 4: Low urgency × High substitutability | Cost volatility rather than existential risk | Optimize cost and flexibility | Leverage market mechanisms and contracts rather than relational dependence |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.