Table 3

Managerial decision recommendations under supplier dominance

Supply conditionDominant riskObjectiveManagerial decisionsStrategies to prioritizeStrategies to avoid
Quadrant 1: High urgency × Low substitutabilityImmediate supply disruption with no viable alternativesSecure access and preferential treatmentAccept dependence on a key supplier to ensure priority access rather than pursuing unrealistic diversificationAccess-preserving strategies: Sole sourcing, preferred customer positioning, bargaining power, long-term relational contracts, vertical integrationDiversification-oriented strategies: back-up sourcing
Quadrant 2: High urgency × High substitutabilityImmediate disruption but alternatives existEnable rapid switchingRelax specifications and activate alternative suppliers to maintain operational continuitySubstitution-oriented strategies: Specification assessment, recipe reformulationRelational lock-in strategies: sole sourcing, deep relational commitment, long planning horizons
Quadrant 3: Low urgency × Low substitutabilityLong-term vulnerability to dominant suppliersBuild structural resilienceInvest in developing alternative suppliers over time while maintaining the dominant relationshipDiversification-oriented strategies: Back-up sourcing, gradual supplier development, coalition-buildingShort-term adaptation strategies: specification assessment
Quadrant 4: Low urgency × High substitutabilityCost volatility rather than existential riskOptimize cost and flexibilityLeverage market mechanisms and contracts rather than relational dependenceContractual strategies: Intelligent deal structures, financial hedging, forward contractsAccess-preserving strategies: bargaining power development, preferred-customer positioning
Source(s): Authors' own creation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options