Table 1

Positioning the present review against key prior review studies

StudyScopeMethodologyKey findings/focusLimitationFuture direction implied
Chavando et al. (2022) Broad RDF landscapeSnapshot reviewReviews RDF characteristics, production and application trendsNot cement-specific; limited focus on regulatory positioning and research agendaNeed sector-specific synthesis of cement manufacturing
Shehata et al. (2022) RDF, circular economy and SDGsNarrative reviewExplains RDF's sustainability role and broader policy relevanceDoes not focus specifically on cement manufacturing operations or kiln-level implicationsNeed operational and cement-sector implications
Sharma et al. (2022) RDF co-processing in cement productionTechnical reviewCompares direct firing and RDF gasification options for cement productionTechnology-centred; limited coverage of CE, waste management hierarchy and policy dimensionsNeed integration of policy, CE and standardisation dimensions
Tihin et al. (2023) MSW-derived RDF for cement co-processingOverview/reviewSummarises feedstock quality, preparation and cement kiln compatibilityPrimarily technical; does not provide a broader sector-specific research agendaNeed broader research agenda beyond technical feedstock issues
Tahir et al. (2024) Sustainable RDF production in waste processing facilitiesCritical reviewFocuses on RDF production systems and process sustainabilityEnd-use in cement manufacturing is not the core analytical focusNeed end-use review focused on cement manufacturing
Present studyRDF in cement manufacturingSystematic literature reviewCombines descriptive and content analysis to clarify RDF/SRF distinctions, sectoral relevance, CE/WMH positioning and future research directionsProvides a cement-sector-specific synthesis and research agendaProvides an integrated agenda for future study
Source(s): Authors' own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options