Comparative evidence on financial drivers of wine firms’ profitability
| Study | Country / sector | Data and methodology | Key variables | Main findings | Gap / limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aytac et al. (2020) | France / wine industry | Panel data; GMM | CCC, ROA, leverage | Working capital negatively affects profitability | No investment variables or broader financial structure analysis beyond working capital management |
| Fazzini and Russo (2014) | Italy / wine industry | Financial ratio analysis | Ownership structure, profitability | Investor-owned firms outperform cooperatives | No explicit working capital analysis or debt structure decomposition |
| Bava and Gromis di Trana (2016) | Italy (piedmont) / wine industry | Regression analysis | Exports, firm size, profitability | Exports and size positively affect profitability | No working capital, investment or dynamic specification |
| Sellers and Alampi-Sottini (2016) | Italy / wine industry | Parametric and non-parametric analysis | Firm size, productivity, profitability | Larger wineries perform better | No working capital or debt structure analysis |
| Migliaccio and Tucci (2019) | Italy / wine industry | Balance-sheet and ratio analysis | Assets, capital structure, performance | Financial structure shapes performance | Limited dynamic specification and no working capital management analysis |
| Silva Faria et al. (2020) | Portugal / wine industry | Panel data; FE, 2SLS, GMM | Firm characteristics, performance | Firm-specific factors drive performance | No explicit working capital or investment dynamics |
| Neves et al. (2022) | Portugal and Spain / wine industry | Panel data; systems GMM | ROA, sales growth, firm factors | Firm-level determinants are significant | Limited focus on working capital and no joint analysis of financial structure and investment dynamics |
| Candeias and Dias (2023) | Old world (Portugal) / wine industry | Panel data; ANN | CCC components, profitability | Non-linear WC–profitability relationship | No debt structure decomposition or investment variables |
| Žiković et al. (2025) | Europe (14 countries) / Wine industry | Dynamic panel models | Firm size, debt, investment | Investment boosts SME profitability | No integrated analysis of working capital, debt structure and investment dynamics |
| Current study | Greece / wine industry | Panel data (2013–2024); OLS, FE, RE | WC, debt structure, CAPEX, size, age | Integrated effects on profitability and resilience | --- |
| Study | Country / sector | Data and methodology | Key variables | Main findings | Gap / limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| France / wine industry | Panel data; | CCC, ROA, leverage | Working capital negatively affects profitability | No investment variables or broader financial structure analysis beyond working capital management | |
| Italy / wine industry | Financial ratio analysis | Ownership structure, profitability | Investor-owned firms outperform cooperatives | No explicit working capital analysis or debt structure decomposition | |
| Italy (piedmont) / wine industry | Regression analysis | Exports, firm size, profitability | Exports and size positively affect profitability | No working capital, investment or dynamic specification | |
| Italy / wine industry | Parametric and non-parametric analysis | Firm size, productivity, profitability | Larger wineries perform better | No working capital or debt structure analysis | |
| Italy / wine industry | Balance-sheet and ratio analysis | Assets, capital structure, performance | Financial structure shapes performance | Limited dynamic specification and no working capital management analysis | |
| Portugal / wine industry | Panel data; FE, 2SLS, | Firm characteristics, performance | Firm-specific factors drive performance | No explicit working capital or investment dynamics | |
| Portugal and Spain / wine industry | Panel data; systems | ROA, sales growth, firm factors | Firm-level determinants are significant | Limited focus on working capital and no joint analysis of financial structure and investment dynamics | |
| Old world (Portugal) / wine industry | Panel data; | Non-linear WC–profitability relationship | No debt structure decomposition or investment variables | ||
| Europe (14 countries) / Wine industry | Dynamic panel models | Firm size, debt, investment | Investment boosts | No integrated analysis of working capital, debt structure and investment dynamics | |
| Current study | Greece / wine industry | Panel data (2013–2024); OLS, FE, | WC, debt structure, CAPEX, size, age | Integrated effects on profitability and resilience | --- |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.