Table 9

Assessment of the PLS predict

PLSLMPLS–LM
ItemRMSEMAEQ2 predictRMSEMAEQ2 predictRMSEMAEQ2predict
ATUDS10.6920.5480.3180.7240.5710.261−0.032−0.0230.057
ATUDS20.6680.5320.3410.7010.5590.284−0.033−0.0270.057
ATUDS30.7050.5560.2990.7390.5800.245−0.034−0.0240.054
INT10.7810.6120.2360.8120.6410.191−0.031−0.0290.045
INT20.7560.5980.2510.7890.6250.204−0.033−0.0270.047
INT30.7680.6040.2430.8010.6310.198−0.033−0.0270.045
INT40.7420.5890.2640.7750.6160.217−0.033−0.0270.047
INT50.7890.6180.2280.8210.6460.185−0.032−0.0280.043
AU10.8120.6370.2140.8450.6620.172−0.033−0.0250.042
AU20.7980.6240.2230.8320.6510.181−0.034−0.0270.042
AU30.8260.6490.2070.8590.6740.166−0.033−0.0250.041

Note(s): Abbreviations: LM, linear model generated to do model comparison; MAE, mean absolute errors; PLS, partial least-squares model proposed in the study; RMSE, root mean square error, ATUDS, attitudes towards the use of drop shipping, INT, intention to use drop shipping, AU, actual use of drop shipping

Source(s): Authors' own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options