Table 4 Literature review workshop... | Emerald Publishing

Table 4

Literature review workshop results

Indicators	Starting point	Starting point	Teaching	Teaching	Teaching	Reporting	Reporting	Integrations	Process control	Target level	Target level	End point	End point	Performance support *
Indicator subcategory	Pre-phase	Enrolling	Communication	Material sharing	Assignments and activities	Feedback (during the course)	Progress	(Integrations)	Building (not, possible, autom.)**	Upper level (process)	Lower level (task)	Close-up and feedback	Grading and registration	(Performance support)
Article
Zhao et al. (2020)	0	0	2	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1
Gugino (2018)	0	0	2	2	1	2	1	1	1	2	2	0	0	1
Bauwens et al. (2020)	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	2
Tokel et al. (2019)	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1
Misfeldt et al. (2019)	0	0	1	1	0	0	2	1	0	1	0	0	2	1
Limongelli et al. (2016)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	1

Indicators	Starting point	Starting point	Teaching	Teaching	Teaching	Reporting	Reporting	Integrations	Process control	Target level	Target level	End point	End point	Performance support *
Indicator subcategory	Pre-phase	Enrolling	Communication	Material sharing	Assignments and activities	Feedback (during the course)	Progress	(Integrations)	Building (not, possible, autom.)**	Upper level (process)	Lower level (task)	Close-up and feedback	Grading and registration	(Performance support)
Article
Zhao et al. (2020)	0	0	2	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1
Gugino (2018)	0	0	2	2	1	2	1	1	1	2	2	0	0	1
Bauwens et al. (2020)	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	2
Tokel et al. (2019)	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1
Misfeldt et al. (2019)	0	0	1	1	0	0	2	1	0	1	0	0	2	1
Limongelli et al. (2016)	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	1

Note(s): *Whether an IS diminishes a teacher’s cognitive load

**If process support is possible to build (0 = not, 1 = possible, 2 = automated)