Table 1

Positive and negative effects of HPWS on employee well-being and related outcomes

StudyJournalContext/SampleHPWS conceptualizationPositive outcomesNegative outcomesKey insight
Agarwal et al. (2025) Human Resource ManagementIndian IT companiesHPWSPsychological meaningfulness and availabilityQuiet quittingPsychological meaningfulness and availability explain HPWS – quiet quitting link
Benítez-Núñez et al. (2024) Journal of Hospitality Marketing and ManagementHospitality sector
COVID-19 context
HPWSJob satisfactionHindrance stressors, turnover intentionsHindrance stressors explain HPWS – employees' outcomes link
Bos-Nehles et al. (2023) International Journal of Management ReviewsReviewAMO bundlesPerformance, engagement, wellbeingUnintended effectsHPWS should be studied as a multidimensional rather than a unitary system
Dorta-Afonso et al. (2023) International Journal of Hospitality ManagementHospitality sectorHPWSJob satisfactionBurnoutHPWS improve job satisfaction partly because they reduce employee burnout
Dorta-Afonso et al. (2025) International Journal of Hospitality ManagementHospitality sectorHPWSEngagement, quality of lifeBurnoutHPWS simultaneously create resource gains and strain effects through different pathways
Guerci et al. (2022) International Journal of Human Resource ManagementEuropean organizationsHR practicesHappiness, relational well-beingHealth-related well-beingDifferent dimensions of well-being may respond differently to HPWS
Guest (2017) Human Resource Management JournalConceptual reviewHRM systemsEngagement, satisfaction, and positive work experiencesWork pressure, stress, and work intensificationHRM may generate both positive and negative outcomes simultaneously
Günther et al. (2022) German Journal of Human Resource ManagementGerman teleworkers, COVID-19 contextTelework-oriented HRMJob satisfaction, engagementPsychological strainComplementary effects of HRM and leadership on employe wellbeing
Han et al. (2025) Human Resource Development InternationalEmployees in organizational settingsHR practicesEmployee well-being and performanceStrainEmployee well-being acts as important mechanism linking HPWS to performance
Han et al. (2020) Human Resource Management ReviewConceptual and empirical synthesisHPWSPerformance, motivation, engagementBurnout, stress, and work intensificationNegative HPWS effects emerge under specific conditions when job demands outweigh resource gains
Jensen et al. (2013) Journal of ManagementUS employeesHPWSEmployee attitudes such as job control and turnover intentionsAnxiety, role overloadJob control conditions HPWS strain effects
Kim et al. (2023) Human Resource ManagementKorean employeesHPWSEmployee resources and work-related attitudesMental health strainSimultaneous resource and demand effects
Kloutsiniotis and Mihail (2020) European Management JournalEuropean employeesHPWSReduced exhaustionIncreased exhaustionThe impact of HPWS on emotional exhaustion depends on the balance between job demands and job resources
Kloutsiniotis et al. (2021) Employee RelationsUK employeesHPWSEngagementExhaustion, work pressureHPWS have a “dark side” where performance gains can coexist with reduced employee well-being
Li et al. (2024) Human Resource Management JournalChinese employeesHR practicesWellbeing, engagementStressDifferent HR practices influence well-being through distinct mechanisms and should not be treated as a uniform system
Loon et al. (2019) International Journal of Human Resource ManagementUK public sectorWellbeing-oriented HR practicesEmployee support, psychological wellbeingPressure, cynicism, stressOrganizational well-being initiatives can create paradoxical outcomes and unintended consequences
Ogbonnaya and Messersmith (2019) Human Resource Management JournalUK employeesAMO-based HPWS bundlesEngagement, job satisfactionWork pressure (bundle-specific)HPWS bundles have differential well-being effects
Peccei and Van De Voorde (2019) Human Resource Management JournalReviewHRM systemsHappiness-related wellbeing and performanceWork intensification, strainDifferent dimensions of well-being respond differently to HRM, helping explain mixed findings in the literature
Ramsay et al. (2000) British Journal of Industrial RelationsUK employeesPerformance-oriented HR practicesProductivityWork intensification, strainPerformance gains from HPWS may result from intensified employee effort rather than employee empowerment
Shaw (2014) Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational BehaviorReviewPerformance-based rewards and pay HR systemHigh-performer retentionConfidence loss among othersReward systems can motivate some employees while creating adverse consequences for others through workforce sorting effects
Shi et al. (2024) Frontiers in PsychologyChinese employeesHPWSHappiness, performanceHealth depletionDifferent dimensions of well-being play distinct roles in linking HPWS to employee performance
Van De Voorde et al. (2012) International Journal of Management ReviewsReview (multiple countries)HRM systemsJob satisfaction, commitment, happiness-related well-beingHealth-related well-being, work intensificationDifferent dimensions of employee well-being respond differently to HRM, helping explain contradictory findings in the literature
Wang et al. (2022) Human Resource Management JournalChinese employeesHPWSLower burnoutHigher burnoutThe effects of HPWS on employee well-being are contingent on organizational context, particularly departmental formalization
Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options