Table 4

SEM results

Direct effectsIndirect effects [bootstrap, 95% CI]Total effects
Controls (only significant ones)Std. estp-levelStd. estp-levelStd. estp-level
Hierarchical position → Emotional exhaustion0.1260.014    
Organizational tenure → Emotional exhaustion−0.1190.038    
Organizational tenure → Self-efficacy0.208<0.001    
Organizational tenure → Work engagement−0.1380.002    
Main relationships
Ownership → Emotional exhaustion−0.0880.093    
Ownership → Self-efficacy−0.1120.034    
Ability HR → Emotional exhaustion−0.320<0.001    
Motivation HR → Emotional exhaustion0.2300.011    
Opportunity HR → Emotional exhaustion−0.270<0.001    
Ability HR → Self-efficacy0.2460.001    
Motivation HR → Self-efficacy−0.2440.008    
Opportunity HR → Self-efficacy0.395<0.001    
Ability HR → Work engagement0.247<0.001    
Motivation HR → Work engagement0.284<0.001    
Opportunity HR → Work engagement0.1380.022    
Moderation relationships
Ownership X Motivation HR → Emotional exhaustion−0.0740.128    
Ownership X Motivation HR → Self-efficacy0.1110.024    
Mediation relationships
Ability HR → Emotional exhaustion → Work engagement0.247<0.0010.0420.0010.2220.001
Ability HR → Self-efficacy → Work engagement0.247<0.0010.0500.0040.2300.001
Motivation HR → Emotional exhaustion → Work engagement0.284<0.001−0.0320.0180.1860.002
Motivation HR → Self-efficacy → Work engagement0.284<0.001−0.0530.0090.1650.010
Opportunity HR → Emotional exhaustion → Work engagement0.1380.0220.0420.0010.1610.005
Opportunity HR → Self-efficacy → Work engagement0.1380.0220.0960.0010.2150.001

Note(s): N = 513; Explained variance (R-squares): Emotional exhaustion = 15%; Self-efficacy = 23%; Work engagement = 53%; CI – confidence interval

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options