Table 5. Direct effect analysis...

Table 5.

Direct effect analysis

Hypotheses	Variables	Β	SE	BC 95% CI		p	Decision
Hypotheses	Variables	Β	SE	Lower	Upper	p	Decision
H1	EI → ESP	0.871	0.030	0.833	0.920	0.000**	Supported
H2	EI → DOC	−0.062	0.084	−0.137	0.231	0.229	Not supported
H3	DOC → ESP	−0.118	0.035	−0.168	−0.054	0.000	Not supported
H4	DOC* EI → ESP	0.171	0.068	0.087	0.287	0.006*	Supported

Hypotheses	Variables	Β	SE	BC 95% CI		p	Decision
Hypotheses	Variables	Β	SE	Lower	Upper	p	Decision
H1	EI → ESP	0.871	0.030	0.833	0.920	0.000**	Supported
H2	EI → DOC	−0.062	0.084	−0.137	0.231	0.229	Not supported
H3	DOC → ESP	−0.118	0.035	−0.168	−0.054	0.000	Not supported
H4	DOC* EI → ESP	0.171	0.068	0.087	0.287	0.006*	Supported

Note(s):

*p < 0.05; and **p < 0.01; BCaCI (bias-corrected and accelerated confidence interval); SE (standard error); EI represents emotional intelligence, DOC represents digital organizational culture and ESP represents employee sustainable performance

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable