Sample characteristics
| Employees (N = 524) | Firms (N = 55) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | S.D. | Frequency | % | ||
| Age | 37.99 | 8.73 | Size | ||
| Hierarchical position | 0.52 | 0.19 | Micro (<10 employees) | 14 | 25.50% |
| Tenure | 13.04 | 8.86 | Small (10–49) | 32 | 58.20% |
| Frequency | % | Medium (50–249) | 9 | 16.40% | |
| Gender | Family ownership | ||||
| Male | 264 | 50.40% | Family firms | 33 | 60.00% |
| Female | 260 | 49.60% | Sector | ||
| Education | Primary | 2 | 3.60% | ||
| High school | 93 | 17.70% | Secondary | 11 | 20.00% |
| Vocational training | 68 | 13.00% | Tertiary | 42 | 76.40% |
| University degree | 201 | 38.40% | Serving market | ||
| Postgraduate | 151 | 28.80% | Local | 9 | 16.40% |
| Doctoral degree | 11 | 2.10% | Regional | 2 | 3.60% |
| National | 17 | 30.90% | |||
| European | 5 | 9.10% | |||
| Worldwide | 22 | 40.00% | |||
| Employees (N = 524) | Firms (N = 55) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | S.D. | Frequency | % | ||
| 37.99 | 8.73 | ||||
| 0.52 | 0.19 | Micro (<10 employees) | 14 | 25.50% | |
| 13.04 | 8.86 | Small (10–49) | 32 | 58.20% | |
| Medium (50–249) | 9 | 16.40% | |||
| Male | 264 | 50.40% | Family firms | 33 | 60.00% |
| Female | 260 | 49.60% | |||
| Primary | 2 | 3.60% | |||
| High school | 93 | 17.70% | Secondary | 11 | 20.00% |
| Vocational training | 68 | 13.00% | Tertiary | 42 | 76.40% |
| University degree | 201 | 38.40% | |||
| Postgraduate | 151 | 28.80% | Local | 9 | 16.40% |
| Doctoral degree | 11 | 2.10% | Regional | 2 | 3.60% |
| National | 17 | 30.90% | |||
| European | 5 | 9.10% | |||
| Worldwide | 22 | 40.00% | |||
Note(s): A mean score of 0.52 indicates that, on average, respondents occupied positions approximately halfway up their organisational hierarchy
In micro firms, the employee response rate was an average of 56%; in small firms, 41%; and in medium-sized firms, 26%
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.