Table 8 Comparison of the objective... | Emerald Publishing

Table 8

Comparison of the objective function values calculated using Ogden 002 to the optimized parameters

N	$T$	P	Bending error BE (distance) [mm]
N	$T$	P	Ogden 002 (Reppel and Weinberg, 2019)	Optimized values
9	$1.6$ mm	$1 b a r$	1.51	1.19
9	$2$ mm	$2 b a r$	6.59	4.93
9	$2.4$ mm	$3 b a r$	1.09	0.86
11	$1.6$ mm	$1 b a r$	2.65	2.23
11	$2$ mm	$2 b a r$	1.00	0.09
11	$2.4$ mm	$3 b a r$	3.75	2.62
11	$1.6$ mm	$1 b a r$	1.61	0.54
11	$2$ mm	$2 b a r$	0.88	0.11
13	$2.4$ mm	$3 b a r$	3.50	1.69
Mean value			2.51	1.58
Median value			1.61	1.19

N	$T$	P	Bending error BE (distance) [mm]
N	$T$	P	Ogden 002 (Reppel and Weinberg, 2019)	Optimized values
9	$1.6$ mm	$1 b a r$	1.51	1.19
9	$2$ mm	$2 b a r$	6.59	4.93
9	$2.4$ mm	$3 b a r$	1.09	0.86
11	$1.6$ mm	$1 b a r$	2.65	2.23
11	$2$ mm	$2 b a r$	1.00	0.09
11	$2.4$ mm	$3 b a r$	3.75	2.62
11	$1.6$ mm	$1 b a r$	1.61	0.54
11	$2$ mm	$2 b a r$	0.88	0.11
13	$2.4$ mm	$3 b a r$	3.50	1.69
Mean value			2.51	1.58
Median value			1.61	1.19