Response criteria: AI-facial recall × AI-facial composite interaction effect
| “Yes” response | B | SE | Wald | p | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No composite | |||||||
| AI-facial recall | |||||||
| No AI-recall | 0 (base) | ||||||
| AI-recall | 0.005 | 0.267 | 0.000 | 0.984 | 1.005 | 0.596 | 1.697 |
| Constant | −0.544 | 0.183 | 8.812 | 0.003 | 0.580 | ||
| Accurate composite | |||||||
| AI-facial recall | |||||||
| No AI-recall | 0 (base) | ||||||
| AI-recall | 0.530 | 0.268 | 3.901 | 0.048 | 1.699 | 1.004 | 2.874 |
| Constant | −0.771 | 0.199 | 15.043 | <0.001 | 0.463 | ||
| Inaccurate composite | |||||||
| AI-facial recall | |||||||
| No AI-recall | 0 (base) | ||||||
| AI-recall | 0.176 | 0.263 | 0.447 | 0.504 | 1.193 | 0.712 | 1.998 |
| Constant | −0.553 | 0.185 | 8.944 | 0.003 | 0.575 | ||
| “Yes” response | B | Wald | p | 95% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-facial recall | |||||||
| No AI-recall | 0 (base) | ||||||
| AI-recall | 0.005 | 0.267 | 0.000 | 0.984 | 1.005 | 0.596 | 1.697 |
| Constant | −0.544 | 0.183 | 8.812 | 0.003 | 0.580 | ||
| AI-facial recall | |||||||
| No AI-recall | 0 (base) | ||||||
| AI-recall | 0.530 | 0.268 | 3.901 | 0.048 | 1.699 | 1.004 | 2.874 |
| Constant | −0.771 | 0.199 | 15.043 | <0.001 | 0.463 | ||
| AI-facial recall | |||||||
| No AI-recall | 0 (base) | ||||||
| AI-recall | 0.176 | 0.263 | 0.447 | 0.504 | 1.193 | 0.712 | 1.998 |
| Constant | −0.553 | 0.185 | 8.944 | 0.003 | 0.575 | ||
The table presents three separate follow-up regressions, one within each level of AI-facial composite accuracy, each testing the effect of AI-facial recall
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.