Table 5. BD-rate ( ⁠ ↓ ⁠ ) results for...

Table 5.

BD-rate (⁠ $↓$ ⁠) results for ablation study of the temporal concatenation methods. Comparison of all ablated methods as well as the VCT and HEVC baseline tested on the UVG, MCL-JCV and HEVC B–E data sets are listed

Model	UVG (%)	MCL-JCV (%)	HEVC-B (%)	HEVC-C (%)	HEVC-D (%)	HEVC-E (%)
VCT	0	0	0	0	0	0
ATEM-Hybrid CA + SeqCat	−16.64	−11.71	−16.80	−18.88	−19.78	−21.54
ATEM-Hybrid CA + ChaCat	−9.62	−7.04	−10.34	−12.12	−13.67	−15.66
ATEM-Swin + SeqCat	−3.02	−1.79	−2.70	−3.73	−5.62	−7.61
ATEM-Swin + ChaCat	−14.86	−11.06	−15.33	−17.02	−18.52	−21.62
HM-16.26	−12.87	−12.18	−5.88	−5.82	−3.37	−56.02

Model	UVG (%)	MCL-JCV (%)	HEVC-B (%)	HEVC-C (%)	HEVC-D (%)	HEVC-E (%)
VCT	0	0	0	0	0	0
ATEM-Hybrid CA + SeqCat	−16.64	−11.71	−16.80	−18.88	−19.78	−21.54
ATEM-Hybrid CA + ChaCat	−9.62	−7.04	−10.34	−12.12	−13.67	−15.66
ATEM-Swin + SeqCat	−3.02	−1.79	−2.70	−3.73	−5.62	−7.61
ATEM-Swin + ChaCat	−14.86	−11.06	−15.33	−17.02	−18.52	−21.62
HM-16.26	−12.87	−12.18	−5.88	−5.82	−3.37	−56.02

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable