Post-tax income percentiles across regimes
| Percentile | Post_Tax__ GNN_Small | Post_Tax_Benchmark_Small | Post_Tax_GNN_Large | Post_Tax_Benchmark_Large |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P10 | 8.738 | 9.282 | 9.681 | 10.416 |
| P25 | 11.553 | 12.105 | 16.168 | 16.887 |
| P50 | 16.267 | 17.291 | 27.164 | 28.760 |
| P75 | 22.566 | 23.622 | 45.844 | 48.573 |
| P90 | 30.527 | 32.590 | 70.053 | 74.759 |
| Percentile | Post_Tax__ GNN_Small | Post_Tax_Benchmark_Small | Post_Tax_GNN_Large | Post_Tax_Benchmark_Large |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P10 | 8.738 | 9.282 | 9.681 | 10.416 |
| P25 | 11.553 | 12.105 | 16.168 | 16.887 |
| P50 | 16.267 | 17.291 | 27.164 | 28.760 |
| P75 | 22.566 | 23.622 | 45.844 | 48.573 |
| P90 | 30.527 | 32.590 | 70.053 | 74.759 |
Note(s): This comparative table reports income percentiles before and after taxation under both schemes. In both countries, the GNN-based tax compresses the upper tail more aggressively, resulting in a lower interdecile range and a lower Gini coefficient
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.