Welfare and progressivity indicators
| Metric | Small economy GNN | Small economy benchmark | Large economy GNN | Large economy benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg utility | 8.75 | 8.10 | 8.50 | 7.95 |
| Max–min utility | 5.12 | 4.20 | 4.90 | 4.05 |
| Kakwani index | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.08 |
| Suits index | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.04 |
| Metric | Small economy GNN | Small economy benchmark | Large economy GNN | Large economy benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg utility | 8.75 | 8.10 | 8.50 | 7.95 |
| Max–min utility | 5.12 | 4.20 | 4.90 | 4.05 |
| Kakwani index | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.08 |
| Suits index | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.04 |
Note(s): This table reports average utility, the max-min payoff, the Kakwani index and the Suits index under both tax systems. Across all scenarios, the structure-based regime achieves higher welfare and lower regressivity, particularly in the small-economy case
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.