Results of regression and mediation analyses predicting WCW
| Direct effect on WCW (Y) | Direct effect on JS (Y) | Effect on WCW (Y) through JS (M) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.82 | 3.79 | 2.47 |
| Control variables | |||
| Age | 0.15* | −0.02 | 0.15* |
| Gender | −0.03 | 0.04 | −0.03 |
| Health | 0.12* | 0.17* | 0.12* |
| Education | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Financial situation | −0.01 | −0.18* | −0.01 |
| Independent variables | |||
| Job autonomy | 0.24* | 0.48* | 0.04 |
| Learning opportunities | 0.27* | 0.35* | 0.10* |
| Social support | 0.30* | 0.35* | 0.07 |
| Mediator | |||
| Job satisfaction | – | – | 0.33* |
| F | 7.658 | 23.17 | 11.06 |
| R2 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.17 |
| Direct effect on WCW (Y) | Direct effect on JS (Y) | Effect on WCW (Y) through JS (M) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.82 | 3.79 | 2.47 |
| Age | 0.15* | −0.02 | 0.15* |
| Gender | −0.03 | 0.04 | −0.03 |
| Health | 0.12* | 0.17* | 0.12* |
| Education | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Financial situation | −0.01 | −0.18* | −0.01 |
| Job autonomy | 0.24* | 0.48* | 0.04 |
| Learning opportunities | 0.27* | 0.35* | 0.10* |
| Social support | 0.30* | 0.35* | 0.07 |
| Job satisfaction | – | – | 0.33* |
| 7.658 | 23.17 | 11.06 | |
| 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.17 | |
Note(s): *p < 0.05; n = 432; WCW = willingness to continue working; JS = job satisfaction
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.