Research trends and related lines for future research
| Area | Topic | Suggested lines for future research | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence | Leveraging advanced AI and transfer learning models | Investigate multi-modal methods for transfer learning, specifically by leveraging visual information (images and videos) to improve performance in tasks involving textual UGC | Hartmann et al. (2023) Qian et al. (2025) |
| Enhance model precision by integrating advanced techniques such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) | |||
| Conduct comparative studies between innovative transfer learning/LLM approaches and traditional research methods to assess how well integrating them might capture the authentic lived experience | |||
| Addressing model challenges and biases | Enhance model capabilities to address complexities in unstructured text, such as sarcasm, spam and fake reviews | Qian et al. (2025) Wang and Liu (2023) | |
| Apply multi-label emotion detection algorithms to address the current limitation where models often assume a single emotion per user review/post | |||
| Apply new methodologies and algorithms (e.g. Naive Bayes or Random Forests) to capture complex, non-linear relationships in customer experience dynamics more effectively than do traditional linear models | |||
| Data source diversification and integration | Use data from multiple UGC platforms to mitigate platform bias and enhance the generalisability of findings | Bigne et al. (2023) Shahhosseini and Khalili Nasr (2024) | |
| Incorporate customer demographics, more settings and different consumer patterns when investigating customer satisfaction and service experience | |||
| Authorship and ethics | Examine how AI-assisted modification of UGC alters perceptions of authorship, accountability and the ethical legitimacy of modifying consumer-created content | Pocchiari et al. (2025) | |
| UGC effects | Exploring new variables | Identify which specific emotional factors stimulate particular planning behaviour following exposure to visual UGC formats | Nguyen et al. (2023) |
| Comparing UGC across different sources and endorsers | Compare the effects of human UGC with non-human endorsers, such as virtual influencers, avatars on Instagram and AI as endorsers, in offline advertising, online social media and the metaverse | Hariningsih et al. (2025) | |
| Refining methodological approaches | Collect behavioural purchasing data instead of relying only on self-reported data | Wei et al. (2023) | |
| Platform mechanisms | Platform governance and moderation | Misrepresentation and missing content: investigate how consumers determine whether a body of content is systematically missing content due to platform interference | Baier et al. (2025) Hochstein et al. (2025) |
| Investigate how consumers make judgements about fake versus real information, and paid versus organic reviews | |||
| Investigate consumer perceptions of human versus algorithmic platform content moderation and curation | |||
| Examine whether transparency about UGC management (e.g. moderation, company reuse) influences users’ trust in the content, with user-perceived control over their own UGC acting as a moderator | |||
| Content formats | Study the behavioural side of Q&A systems, particularly how consumers incorporate Q&A into their purchase decision-making processes | Khern-am-nuai et al. (2024) | |
| UGC vs FGC | Comparative influence and interaction mechanisms | Investigate the causal relationship and interactions between UGC and FGC in influencing consumer behaviours | Li et al. (2024) Barquero Cabrero et al. (2023) |
| Examine the effects of FGC, UGC and co-created content on brand economic value and company revenues | |||
| Assess the differential audience effects of brand campaigns integrating UGC vs FGC vs influencer content | |||
| Expand platforms and contexts | Investigate the effectiveness of UGC and FGC on less-studied social media platforms, such as TikTok, Snapchat, LinkedIn and WeChat | Crapa et al. (2024) Li et al. (2024) | |
| Analyse empirical evidence of UGC and FGC effects across industries and in less-studied industries (e.g. durable goods) | |||
| Company intervention in consumer-led spaces | Examine how company involvement in consumer-led UGC environments is perceived by consumers and potential consequences: legitimate stewardship vs appropriation of consumer space | Pocchiari et al. (2025) | |
| Analyse whether consumers apply different ethical standards to company interventions in online reviews depending on whether the intervention is relational or commercially oriented | |||
| Multimodality | Combination of multimedia formats | Explore how rich content, such as live streams and short-format videos, for example, TikToks and Instagram reels, coexist with leaner mixtures (text and/or images) and how consumers derive value from these distinctive forms | Singh and Pandey (2024) Kübler et al. (2024) |
| Content alignment | Examine how consumers resolve conflict when there is misalignment between photos/videos and text (valence incoherence) | Ceylan et al. (2024) Kübler et al. (2024) | |
| Investigate how images in fake reviews work in terms of helpfulness and trust | |||
| Capturing emotions through new technologies | Complement sentiment analysis of textual UGC with analysis of hidden emotions within UGC videos, through auto-emotion-detection AI technologies | Bigne et al. (2024) Jia et al. (2023) | |
| Use of neuromarketing techniques to assess consumers’ emotional responses to the emotions expressed in both textual and video UGC | |||
| Simultaneous dimensions | Study complex relationships between all three content dimensions: format, source and platform | Singh and Pandey (2024) | |
| Destination image | Destination image dissonance | Examine the interrelationships among the destination image projected by DMOs, image as portrayed by users through UGC and tourists’ perceptions of the image in visuals-based social media platforms | Torres-Pruñonosa et al. (2024) |
| Destination image processing | Examine the hypothesis that most encounters with idealised destination UGC photographs in everyday life are processed via the aesthetics-only route, generating immediate positive aesthetic experiences rather than critical cognitive evaluations | Ortanderl and Bausch (2023) | |
| Cross-cultural studies | Assess the role of cultural concepts (religion, psychographic features) in destination image formation | Lee and Park (2023) |
| Area | Topic | Suggested lines for future research | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence | Leveraging advanced | Investigate multi-modal methods for transfer learning, specifically by leveraging visual information (images and videos) to improve performance in tasks involving textual | |
| Enhance model precision by integrating advanced techniques such as retrieval-augmented generation ( | |||
| Conduct comparative studies between innovative transfer learning/LLM approaches and traditional research methods to assess how well integrating them might capture the authentic lived experience | |||
| Addressing model challenges and biases | Enhance model capabilities to address complexities in unstructured text, such as sarcasm, spam and fake reviews | ||
| Apply multi-label emotion detection algorithms to address the current limitation where models often assume a single emotion per user review/post | |||
| Apply new methodologies and algorithms (e.g. Naive Bayes or Random Forests) to capture complex, non-linear relationships in customer experience dynamics more effectively than do traditional linear models | |||
| Data source diversification and integration | Use data from multiple | ||
| Incorporate customer demographics, more settings and different consumer patterns when investigating customer satisfaction and service experience | |||
| Authorship and ethics | Examine how AI-assisted modification of | ||
| Exploring new variables | Identify which specific emotional factors stimulate particular planning behaviour following exposure to visual | ||
| Comparing | Compare the effects of human | ||
| Refining methodological approaches | Collect behavioural purchasing data instead of relying only on self-reported data | ||
| Platform mechanisms | Platform governance and moderation | Misrepresentation and missing content: investigate how consumers determine whether a body of content is systematically missing content due to platform interference | |
| Investigate how consumers make judgements about fake versus real information, and paid versus organic reviews | |||
| Investigate consumer perceptions of human versus algorithmic platform content moderation and curation | |||
| Examine whether transparency about | |||
| Content formats | Study the behavioural side of Q&A systems, particularly how consumers incorporate Q&A into their purchase decision-making processes | ||
| Comparative influence and interaction mechanisms | Investigate the causal relationship and interactions between | ||
| Examine the effects of FGC, | |||
| Assess the differential audience effects of brand campaigns integrating | |||
| Expand platforms and contexts | Investigate the effectiveness of | ||
| Analyse empirical evidence of | |||
| Company intervention in consumer-led spaces | Examine how company involvement in consumer-led | ||
| Analyse whether consumers apply different ethical standards to company interventions in online reviews depending on whether the intervention is relational or commercially oriented | |||
| Multimodality | Combination of multimedia formats | Explore how rich content, such as live streams and short-format videos, for example, TikToks and Instagram reels, coexist with leaner mixtures (text and/or images) and how consumers derive value from these distinctive forms | |
| Content alignment | Examine how consumers resolve conflict when there is misalignment between photos/videos and text (valence incoherence) | ||
| Investigate how images in fake reviews work in terms of helpfulness and trust | |||
| Capturing emotions through new technologies | Complement sentiment analysis of textual | ||
| Use of neuromarketing techniques to assess consumers’ emotional responses to the emotions expressed in both textual and video | |||
| Simultaneous dimensions | Study complex relationships between all three content dimensions: format, source and platform | ||
| Destination image | Destination image dissonance | Examine the interrelationships among the destination image projected by DMOs, image as portrayed by users through | |
| Destination image processing | Examine the hypothesis that most encounters with idealised destination | ||
| Cross-cultural studies | Assess the role of cultural concepts (religion, psychographic features) in destination image formation |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.